The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    FBI's effective Most Wanted list turns 60

  • Politics

    Pay raise sought for bilingual fed workers

  • National

    Ex-chief regrets D.C. fire merger with EMS

  • National

    Obama urges China to cut currency link

  • Business

    Obama pledges to boost U.S. exports

  • Politics

    House leaders call pro-life group's bluff

  • Politics

    House GOP bans earmarks for members

Sunday, June 20, 2004

Liberals hammer platform plank

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More Stories

  • Taliban: Kandahar blasts a 'warning'
  • Sen. Brown bashes 'bitter' health push
  • Henry Kissinger hospitalized in S. Korea
  • Iraq vote signals shift from hard-line leaders

By

SANTA FE, N.M. -- Civil rights activists yesterday called for Democrats to take an explicit stand in their 2004 party platform against the proposed Federal Marriage Amendment and for "equal recognition of same-sex relationships."

Testifying on the final day of hearings for the Democratic Platform Committee, the activists said the platform must speak strongly against the amendment, which defines marriage as only between a man and woman because it is scheduled for a debate in the Senate next month.

"We do not believe discrimination should be enshrined into the Constitution," said Laura Murphy, director of the American Civil Liberties Union in Washington. "Your statement now, and your statement when you go and meet when you finalize the platform in Miami, is of paramount importance to give strength to your colleagues."

Same-sex unions are likely to be a critical new issue in the 2004 platform, which will be written next month at a platform committee meeting in Miami.

In 2000, the platform was brief in its support for homosexual rights: "We support the full inclusion of gay and lesbian families in the life of the nation. This would include an equitable alignment of benefits."

Though most Democratic leaders have said they believe marriage is a union between a man and a woman, some have said they will vote against the pending Federal Marriage Amendment, which would enshrine that definition in the Constitution.

One of those politicians is Sen. John Kerry, the Democrats' presumptive presidential nominee.

In her submitted testimony, Cheryl Jacques, president of the Human Rights Campaign, praised Mr. Kerry's opposition to the Federal Marriage Amendment and his record of supporting homosexual rights, but she also had a pointed reminder to Democrats: "We would remind all Democrats that they can speak of their reverence for the institution of marriage without talking about excluding anyone from it."

Drafting committee members praised the testimony, and one member, Massachusetts Democratic Party Chairman Philip Johnston, cited the experience in his state, where same-sex couples are now allowed to wed.

"To the best of my knowledge, the world is still spinning on its axis and the sky hasn't fallen," he said. "I don't know any heterosexual marriages that have broken up as a result of this. I just wanted to make that announcement."

12Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Top Stories

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Obama's sick obsession
  2. EDITORIAL: Holding Holder in contempt
  3. WOLF: Obama family health care fracas
  4. Female coach takes over Coolidge football
  5. PRUDEN: 'Tis better to kill the health care corpse now
More Top Stories »
  1. Texas adopts conservative curriculum
  2. Ex-chief regrets D.C. fire merger with EMS
  3. Hillary Clinton rebukes Israel
  4. KUHNER: A gangster regime
  5. House to put loan reform in health care bill

Most Commented

  1. EDITORIAL: Obama's sick obsession
  2. Texas adopts conservative curriculum
  3. Lesbian teen sues to force school to hold prom
  4. Pelosi: Confident House will pass health care
  5. Dems: 'Won't be long' for health care
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Holding Holder in contempt
  2. Sen. Brown bashes 'bitter' health push
  3. Utah lawmaker resigns after confessing hot-tub incident
  4. House to put loan reform in health care bill
  5. Prius case leaves questions hanging

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Blogs & Columns

  • Water Cooler

    Dems still scraping for health reform votes

  • Belief Blog

    Sayonara to the president's faith-based council

  • Technology

    Ordering iPad is painless, except for the wallet hit

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.