The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    Senate chided for slow approval of new border chief

  • Business

    China's yuan value hits U.S. economy, two experts say

  • National

    Suicides spur review of Massachusetts bullying bill

  • National

    SANDERS: Watch out if Iran becomes the 10th nuclear power

  • National

    FBI's effective Most Wanted list turns 60

  • Politics

    Pay raise sought for bilingual fed workers

  • National

    Ex-chief regrets D.C. fire merger with EMS

Thursday, October 7, 2004

Proportional split of electoral votes on Colorado ballot

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More Stories

  • China's yuan value hits U.S. economy, two experts say
  • Suicides spur review of Massachusetts bullying bill
  • Technicians can't replicate runaway Prius
  • Pakistani jets pound Taliban hide-outs

By

DENVER -- The presidential candidate who wins a majority of the vote in Colorado next month could take all nine of the state's electoral votes, or he could take five.

It all depends on the outcome of Amendment 36, a state ballot measure that would make Colorado the first state in the nation to split its electoral votes proportionally, replacing the state's winner-take-all system.

Amendment 36 was written to take effect this year, which means its effect would be felt immediately. That means, for example, that even if President Bush wins a majority of the vote, Sen. John Kerry still could snare as many as four electoral votes.

Such a division would have prevented either presidential candidate from garnering the required 270 electoral votes in 2000, sending the election to the House of Representatives. A similar split also could determine the outcome in this year's close race, a detail not lost on national politicos, who will be watching the vote on Amendment 36 closely.

Coloradans will accept or reject the measure on Nov. 2, the same day as the presidential vote.

So far, the pros are running ahead of the cons. A statewide Ciruli Associates poll found 51 percent in favor of the measure and 37 percent against it. The rest were undecided.

"We believe this will increase voter turnout. If you ask people why they don't vote, they'll say, 'It's because my vote doesn't count,' " said Julie Brown, director of Make Your Vote for President Count, the pro-Amendment 36 group.

Analysts note that the race is still young. The anti-36 forces, led by Gov. Bill Owens, a Republican, argue that the measure would destroy Colorado's national influence.

Denver pollster Floyd Ciruli predicted that the measure's popularity would drop below 50 percent, now that the opposition is weighing in.

"I think it will have a very difficult time passing," Mr. Ciruli said. "The Republican Party is uniformly against, there are some Democrats against it, the governor is raising money against it, and the editorial pages are coming out against it."

12Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Top Stories

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Obama's sick obsession
  2. EDITORIAL: Holding Holder in contempt
  3. WOLF: Obama family health care fracas
  4. EDITORIAL: Pocket money for politicians
  5. LAMBRO: Roberts for the defense
More Top Stories »
  1. PRUDEN: 'Tis better to kill the health care corpse now
  2. Texas adopts conservative curriculum
  3. Utah lawmaker resigns in hot-tub incident
  4. KUHNER: A gangster regime
  5. Pay raise sought for bilingual fed workers

Most Commented

  1. EDITORIAL: Obama's sick obsession
  2. Texas adopts conservative curriculum
  3. Pelosi confident House will pass health care
  4. Utah lawmaker resigns in hot-tub incident
  5. Dems: 'Won't be long' for health care
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Holding Holder in contempt
  2. Sen. Brown bashes 'bitter' health push
  3. Prius case leaves questions hanging
  4. Hillary Clinton rebukes Israel
  5. LAMBRO: Roberts for the defense

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Blogs & Columns

  • Water Cooler

    Dems still scraping for health reform votes

  • Belief Blog

    Sayonara to the president's faith-based council

  • Technology

    Ordering iPad is painless, except for the wallet hit

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.