Marriage amendments all expected to pass

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen

By

State constitutional amendments defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman are likely to pass in all 11 states where they are on the Nov. 2 ballot, making the amendment a factor in the presidential race in three battleground states -- Michigan, Ohio and Oregon.

The big question is whether President Bush or Democratic nominee Sen. John Kerry will benefit from having the amendment on the ballot.

"It's really a fascinating question. I don't have an answer," said Brad Snavely, executive director of the Michigan Family Forum, a traditional-values group that supports Michigan's marriage amendment.

"I think it's difficult to tell at this point," said Christopher Barron, political director of the homosexual-rights group Log Cabin Republicans, which opposes the amendments. "There are so many wild cards in this election ... these state amendments are wild cards."

In addition to defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman, all but one of the amendments -- Montana's -- says other marriage-like unions -- such as civil unions of same-sex couples -- will not be recognized.

Recent polls indicate that the 11 amendments are likely to pass, with support ranging from 52 percent in North Dakota to 77 percent in Arkansas.

Opponents of the amendments have depicted them as crass attempts to attract voters for Mr. Bush, who supports a federal constitutional amendment defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman.

Mr. Kerry, who represents Massachusetts in the Senate, has said that although he thinks marriage should be between a man and a woman, he doesn't support a federal constitutional amendment defining the institution.

The amendments in Michigan, Ohio and Oregon were pushed onto November ballots by massive petition drives led by conservative groups. Amendment supporters maintain that they are responding to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decision in November that legalized same-sex "marriage" in that state.

The only way to trump "activist" judges is to define marriage in their state constitution, amendment supporters say.