- Article
- Comments ()
- Videos
The District's latest traffic-camera contract rauns counter to federal guidelines and expert recommendations that warn against paying contractors based on the number of citations they issue because such pay plans erode public support for the automated programs.
"Where a private contractor is responsible for the processing of citations, compensation to private vendors based on the number of citations issued should be avoided," the Federal Highway Administration said in a report on red-light cameras last month.
"Compensation should be provided solely on the value of the equipment or the services provided," the federal report states.
The District recently extended its red-light and speed camera contract with ACS State & Local Solutions to include a new compensation plan for the vendor. The new contract provides a $651,735 monthly fee and an extra $23,000 for each group of 2,500 tickets the vendor issues over a threshold of 53,750.
Previously, the city had paid ACS a fixed monthly fee of $759,992.
According to the agreement, city officials are projecting the number of citations issued in the District could increase to as many as 130,750 per month. Under that scenario, ACS would receive $1.3 million a month, according to the contract.
Jack Archer, legal counsel for the Virginia-based National Committee for Uniform Traffic Laws and Ordinances, said most transportation experts agree with the federal guidelines against tying compensation to ticket volume.
"When you link compensation to the number of tickets issued, you create a question in the minds of the public," Mr. Archer said. "You're raising the question of whether this is a revenue raiser, and that's a horrible thing to do."
Instead, localities should pay vendors on a fixed-fee basis regardless of the number of citations motorists receive, he said.
Since August 2001, speed cameras have generated more than $63 million in fines for the District. The fines from red-light cameras at 39 intersections have totaled more than $28 million since 1999.







Post a comment
There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.