Limits on sales of wine rejected

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By

The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday made it easier for consumers to buy wine directly from out-of-state wineries with a ruling that struck down state restrictions on the sales.

Twenty-four states, including Maryland, have restrictions on out-of-state shipments by the $21.6 billion wine industry.

The ruling is a victory for small winemakers who want to expand their businesses and a defeat for the wholesale distributors that are bypassed when wineries ship directly to consumers. Wine lovers across the country could get access to hundreds, if not thousands, of additional wines.

The 5-4 ruling overturned laws in Michigan and New York as discriminatory because they allow in-state wineries, but not out-of state companies, to ship directly to consumers.

"States have broad power to regulate liquor," Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote for the majority. "This power, however, does not allow states to ban, or severely limit, the direct shipment of out-of-state wine while simultaneously authorizing direct shipment by in-state producers.

"If a state chooses to allow direct shipments of wine, it must do so on evenhanded terms," he wrote.

Maryland prohibits its wineries from shipping wine to consumers anywhere and bans direct interstate shipments of wine to their residents.

Virginia and the District of Columbia allow limited shipments from out-of-state wineries.

"That's why we feel this Supreme Court ruling does not affect us," said Michael Golden, spokesman for the Maryland comptroller's office, which licenses the state's 16 wineries.

However, the ruling opens the door for Maryland to eliminate its ban on all shipments, said Kevin Atticks, executive director of the Maryland Wineries Association.