The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Local

    Oh snow! Another storm approaches

  • Health

    Obama fights obesity with executive power

  • Investigation

    Stimulus foes see value in seeking cash

  • Politics

    Obama's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent

  • Security

    Ayatollah: Iran's military will 'punch' West

  • Politics

    Rep. Murtha dies at age 77

  • Security

    Army warned about jihadist threat in '08

Monday, October 23, 2006

Ballot measures propose limits on judicial authority

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More Stories

  • Oh snow! Another storm approaches
  • Dow up 214 on hopes about Greek debt
  • Iran accelerates nuclear program
  • Afghan avalanches kill at least 28

By

DENVER -- Western conservatives are gunning for the judiciary this election year with a half-dozen ballot measures that would rope in the authority of what they describe as activist judges.

Case in point is Colorado, where former state Senate leader John Andrews tried for years to solve the problem of activist judges who he said routinely legislated from the bench, often at the expense of conservatives.

His efforts in the legislature fell short, but Mr. Andrews isn't finished. He is the prime mover behind Amendment 40, a proposed constitutional amendment that would limit state appellate judges to 10-year terms, making Colorado the first state to limit the office of top-tier judges.

"We see a pattern of ideological and political decisions from the bench, and it points to a consistent tendency of appellate judges in Colorado to rewrite the law," said Mr. Andrews, now a fellow with the Claremont Institute, after a press conference yesterday at the state Capitol.

Amendment 40 faces overwhelming opposition of the state's legal and political establishment. It is opposed by virtually every top lawmaker in the state, including Republican Gov. Bill Owens, Republican Attorney General John Suthers, and former Democratic Govs. Richard Lamm and Roy Romer. The state's leading newspapers have also editorialized against the proposal.

They argue that Amendment 40 would force out good judges, create judicial backlogs and empower governors to stack the courts with partisan picks. The measure would result in a one-time retroactive removal of five Supreme Court judges and seven appellate court judges in 2009, which critics say would deprive the courts of decades of experience.

"This is a misguided measure that would be devastating to Colorado courts," Mr. Suthers said. "Because it is retroactive, a majority of Colorado's justices and judges will be kicked off the bench. This will be bad for Colorado citizens and the judiciary."

Mr. Andrews insists the measure is not an extreme solution, noting that most justices leave the state Supreme Court after less than 10 years anyway.

"This is more of a safeguard against those judges who say they can stay around forever, rather than a radical restructuring of the judiciary," Mr. Andrews said. "At the same time, it's partly symbolic. It sends a message that people are fed up with lawmaking from the bench. Such a rebuke would be felt in Colorado but also other states."

A truly radical solution would be Amendment E, the South Dakota proposal that would eliminate judicial immunity and allow citizens to sue judges. Known as "Jail 4 Judges," the measure would clear the path for lawsuits for offenses that include "blocking of a lawful conclusion of a case."

In Montana, voters will decide whether to approve CI-98, a measure that would allow residents to recall justices or judges for "any reason" and says removal from office is "a political question answered solely by ... the recall election." Judges now may be recalled only for reasons such as mental incompetence and official misconduct.

An Oregon amendment would require appellate judges to be elected from newly created geographic districts in an effort to give the state's more conservative rural areas greater representation on the state's liberal-leaning courts.

In Colorado, a local television poll conducted last month found Amendment 40 leading 55 percent to 40 percent, despite the efforts of the better-financed opposition campaign. Mr. Andrews points to a series of court rulings, most recently the state Supreme Court's decision to disqualify a ballot measure that would have denied non-emergency state services to illegal aliens.

Even though he expects to be outspent by at least 3-to-1 in the campaign's final weeks, Mr. Andrews says he is convinced most voters will respond positively to the idea of reining in the judiciary.

"The story with term limits in Colorado has been that the establishment is always against them and the people always support them," he said.

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Va. Senate OKs ban on sexual orientation bias
  2. Stimulus foes see value in seeking cash
  3. LYNCH: Drug czar should go
  4. Oh snow! Another storm approaches
  5. Storm could put Super Bowl fans in dark
More Top Stories »
  1. Ayatollah: Iran's military will 'punch' West
  2. President's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent
  3. Clinton: Islamist terror is No. 1 threat
  4. Super snow Sunday: Region digs out from 'historic' storm
  5. Prop. 8 trial stirs questions, emotions

Most Shared

  1. BLANKLEY: Palin delivers sparkle, warmth
  2. Stimulus foes see value in seeking cash
  3. Army warned about jihadist threat in '08
  4. New federal office for global warming
  5. STEYN: The 'corpseman' cometh
More Top Stories »
  1. Obama's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent
  2. PRUDEN: Hatching the Silly Bowl
  3. Ayatollah: Iran's military will 'punch' West
  4. EDITORIAL: Free the Baptist 10 in Haiti
  5. Oh snow! Another storm approaches

Most Commented

  1. Palin: President run may be 'right thing'
  2. Clinton: Islamist terror is No. 1 threat
  3. Obama's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent
  4. New federal office for global warming
  5. Rep. Murtha dies at age 77
More Top Stories »
  1. Obama to host televised, bipartisan meeting on health care
  2. Prop. 8 trial stirs questions, emotions
  3. Blacks face Senate shutout in 2011
  4. LYNCH: Drug czar should go
  5. BLANKLEY: Palin delivers sparkle, warmth

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    White House communications chief to treat Fox differently than ABC, NBC

  • Belief Blog

    Anglican day of reckoning coming

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    (Almost) All about Apple's iPad

  • Redskins 360

    This is goodbye ... for now

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.