- Article
- Comments ()
- Videos
The urge of lawmakers amid the unthinkable is to entertain the feel-good notion of legislation that could have prevented the awfulness.
The inclination to legislate the worst impulses out of the human condition is understandable in the wake of the horror at Virginia Tech that left 32 dead at the hand of a gun-toting sicko, who then shot himself. But as we know only too well, if only from anecdotal experience, laws have their limits.
To take the principle of gun-control measures to the ultimate level, let's say America decided in the coming weeks that it no longer could tolerate the heinous acts of a lone gunman, whether in Blacksburg, Va., or in an Amish schoolhouse in Paradise, Pa.
Let's say we the people, in tandem with our lawmakers, said no to guns, period. Let's say we even said no to guns employed by sportsmen to kill game.
What would be the outcome? Would America suddenly become a gun-free safe zone?
That certainly would be the intent of the draconian measure. Unfortunately for us, just as one learns one thing in the classroom and discovers something entirely different in the real world, it sometimes works the same with the policies of lawmakers and wonks. Call it the unintended consequences of the well-meaning.
We humans are an ingenious lot. Show us a demand for a particular good, legal or otherwise, and rest assured some of us will endeavor to fill that demand.
Our so-called war on illegal drugs has not exactly been a whopping success. You can go to all parts of our city and find whatever you need to help you get through the day. It is not very difficult. In fact, police sometimes have a fairly good idea of who's doing what but lack the evidence to bring charges against the peddler.
This cat-and-mouse game is played in urban and rural areas throughout America. And to think it is all built around what is fundamentally illegal.
But there is an insatiable demand for drugs in this country, and so there is always going to be a group of people ready to meet the demand, regardless of government initiatives. This was true in the Prohibition years of 1920 to 1933, an especially lucrative period for those who ran liquor and opened speakeasies.









Post a comment
There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.