The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    FBI's effective Most Wanted list turns 60

  • Politics

    Pay raise sought for bilingual fed workers

  • National

    Ex-chief regrets D.C. fire merger with EMS

  • National

    Obama urges China to cut currency link

  • Business

    Obama pledges to boost U.S. exports

  • Politics

    House leaders call pro-life group's bluff

  • Politics

    House GOP bans earmarks for members

Home » Opinion » Editorials

Friday, August 31, 2007

Promising Iraq developments

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More Editorials Stories

  • EDITORIAL: Holding Holder in contempt
  • EDITORIAL: Pocket money for politicians
  • EDITORIAL: Obama's sick obsession
  • EDITORIAL: Federal bonus bonanza

By

With evidence mounting that the troop "surge" in Iraq is achieving results, even diehard opponents of the war like Sens. Carl Levin and Dick Durbin have been forced to concede that the change in strategy ordered by President Bush is working militarily. The American public seems to believe that victory can be achieved in Iraq. According to a UPI/Zogby Poll released on Wednesday, 54 percent of Americans said the war is not lost. So, in recent weeks, these politicians have turned their attention to the lack of political progress in Iraq.

But on Sunday, five Iraqi political leaders (Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, a Shi'ite; President Jalal Talabani, a Kurd; Vice President Tariq Hashemi, a Sunni; Vice President Adel Abdul Mahdi, a Shi'ite; and Massoud Barzani, president of the Kurdistan Regional Government) announced they had reached agreement on "de-Ba'athification" — the policy that barred many members of Saddam Hussein's overwhelmingly Sunni Ba'ath Party from holding positions in the post-Saddam government. They also agreed on provincial elections; a law to distribute oil revenue; and a law providing for the release of prisoners held without charge. All of these changes were demanded by the Iraqi Accordance Front, the major Sunni bloc in parliament, which created a political firestorm when it withdrew its six ministers from from the government Aug. 1.

The most important of these is the de-Ba'athification agreement. U.S. officials concluded years ago that the relatively far-reaching purge of Ba'athists which took place after Saddam's ouster in 2003 had been a mistake, and that the ban should be restricted to the most senior-level Ba'ath Party members. But until Sunday's announcement the Iraqis themselves had been deadlocked, on the issue. The main stumbling block had been the fact that Iraqi Shi'ites, who had been brutally repressed by Saddam's dictatorship, were not prepared to yield. Now, that appears to be changing.

To be certain, Iraq's democratically elected leadership has a long way to go as far as implementing such an agreement is concerned. Powerful forces, among them al Qaeda and the terror backers in Tehran and Damascus, are likely to redouble their efforts to foment civil war and destroy any possibility of reconciliation. But it's also clear that things have been changing for the better in Iraq in recent months. Now that an agreement has been reached, the challenge becomes implementing it.

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Shared

  1. WOLF: Obama family health care fracas
  2. Gov't workers feel no economic pain
  3. Ex-chief regrets D.C. fire merger with EMS
  4. EDITORIAL: Federal bonus bonanza
  5. EDITORIAL: The lie about health care costs
More Top Stories »
  1. Exports nominee tied to 2 watch list firms
  2. Bush's union transparency rules retracted under Obama
  3. Pay raise sought for bilingual fed workers
  4. KUHNER: A gangster regime
  5. TYRRELL: Fiddling with talk radio

Most Commented

  1. Gov't workers feel no economic pain
  2. Bush's union transparency rules retracted under Obama
  3. Chief justice reignites feud with Obama
  4. Immigrant rights advocates, poised to rally, pressure Obama
  5. EDITORIAL: Packing a gun in Starbucks
More Top Stories »
  1. Lesbian teen sues to force school to hold prom
  2. Some Democrats shun Obama event in St. Louis
  3. WOLF: Obama family health care fracas
  4. Exports nominee tied to 2 watch list firms
  5. EDITORIAL: The lie about health care costs

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Question of the day

What film will win Best Picture during Sunday's Academy Awards?

Blogs & Columns

  • Water Cooler

    Toyota hybrid runaway story a hoax?

  • Belief Blog

    Sayonara to the president's faith-based council

  • Technology

    Ordering iPad is painless, except for the wallet hit

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.