Ethics watchdogs looking for teeth

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By

New ethics rules in Congress look strict on paper but lack robust enforcement to make them meaningful, a longtime pitfall of anti-corruption measures, government watchdogs say.

Lax enforcement, they say, exposes Democrats to criticism of conducting business as usual in Washington now that they hold the majority.

"If nobody steps up enforcement, the Democrats will have a problem in 2008," said Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.

"Much of the conduct that everyone was upset about in the last election was already against the rules," she said. "Now they are really, really against the rules. ... Nothing has changed in the enforcement realm."

The Senate bill, which passed 96-2, included bans on meals, junkets, air travel and other gifts from lobbyists.

However, the new majority must recognize that failure to uphold rules for even a small offense could hurt the Democrats, Ms. Sloan said.

The party's election gains were credited partly to voter anger over Republican scandals such as the influence peddling of disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff and bribery schemes involving former Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham of California.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, is particularly vulnerable to charges of backsliding on ethics after promising the "most ethical Congress in history," said Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, a group promoting integrity in politics.

Mrs. Pelosi found out how vulnerable Monday when USA Today reported that she and two other top Democrats -- Rep. Rahm Emanuel of Illinois, the caucus chairman, and Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana -- broke ethics rules by not disclosing that they are officers of their family charities.

"It was an oversight and we are working to correct it," Pelosi spokesman Drew Hammill said. "The ethics process and all the regulations entailed are very complicated and obviously there is no intent to violate ethics rules."