- Article
- Comments ()
While there is a tendency to label judges "liberal" or "conservative" -- and the labels may fit, even if somewhat loosely -- the real puzzle are judges who start out one way and move the other way over time.
In the population at large, and even among the intelligentsia, the usual movement over the years has been from left to right. The phrase "radical at 20 and conservative at 40" has been true enough, often enough, to become a cliche.
Most of the leading conservative intellectuals were at least liberal, and often radical, in their youth. That includes Milton Friedman, Friedrich Hayek and the whole neoconservative movement. In politics, the leading conservative figure of the 20th century -- Ronald Reagan -- was a liberal in his early years.
On the United States Supreme Court, however, the movement has been in the opposite direction.
In an outstanding recently published book titled "Supreme Conflict," author Jan Crawford Greenburg traces systematically the leftward movement of Supreme Court justices who were initially part of the conservative wing of that court.
The late Justice Harry Blackmun began his career on the high court by voting with his fellow Minnesotan, conservative Chief Justice Warren Burger, so consistently that the media called them the "Minnesota Twins."
Over the years, however, Blackmun moved steadily leftward and established as his judicial legacy the decision in Roe v. Wade that created a "constitutional right" to abortion out of thin air.
Justice Anthony Kennedy likewise began his tenure on the Supreme Court by voting "with Scalia and Rehnquist more than with any other justice," as noted in "Supreme Conflict." The liberal media savaged him as an enemy of civil rights.
Years ago, a judge who had served with Anthony Kennedy, when both were judges in California, warned at a social gathering that Justice Kennedy "is not a strong person."
Others warned against Justice Kennedy in Washington, as detailed in "Supreme Conflict," but the Reagan administration went ahead and nominated him anyway. Justice Kennedy's record on the Supreme Court fully justified all these misgivings.







Post a comment
There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.