The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • NFL

    Same old problems plague Redskins

  • Politics

    Obama: It's Senate's turn on health care

  • Security

    Army chief wary of backlash against Muslim soldiers

  • Sports

    Offense erupts in Caps' victory

  • National

    KUHNHENN: 10% jobless rate is Obama's troubling world

  • World

    Joint forces probe NATO air strike

  • National

    Fla. shooting suspect 'mentally ill'

Home » Opinion » Editorials

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

A FRESH and better farm bill

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos

More Editorials Stories

  • EDITORIAL: Mr. Obama, stay away from this wall
  • EDITORIAL: Full 'time' for heinous crimes
  • EDITORIAL: President Obama causes more unemployment
  • EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism

By

Disappointed with the bipartisan, spendthrift ways of Congress? Horrified by the long-term deficit projections? Worried that Congress seems incapable of managing any mandatory entitlement program with any semblance of fiscal responsibility? Tired of the partisan rancor that has characterized congressional policy-making in recent years? Disturbed by the seeming inability of red state Republicans and blue state Democrats to collaborate for the common good? Frightened by the intensity of the internecine grass-roots warfare conducted over countless issues?

Well, meet Democratic Sen. Frank Lautenberg from the blue state of New Jersey along America's Eastern Seaboard and Republican Sen. Richard Lugar from the red state of Indiana in the nation's Midwest heartland. Joined by Republican co-sponsors Orrin Hatch of Utah and Susan Collins of Maine and Democrats Bob Menendez of New Jersey and Ben Cardin of Maryland, among others, Messrs. Lugar and Lautenberg have introduced a genuinely reform-oriented farm bill — the Farm, Ranch, Equity, Stewardship and Health (FRESH) Act of 2007 — that takes major steps in the right direction.

At the very moment that the mutually back-scratching, special-interest-dominated agriculture committees in both congressional chambers have reported terrible, business-as-usual, five-year agriculture-reauthorization measures, the Lugar-Lautenberg FRESH alternative is truly a breath of fresh air. Its common-sense priorities are so striking that the only sharp elbows exchanged between liberal and conservative interest groups are the ones necessary to get to the front of the line to be the first to embrace Lugar-Lautenberg. When left-of-center Environmental Defense, Environmental Working Group and the National Urban League join right-of-center Club for Growth, Council for Citizens Against Government Waste and the National Taxpayers Union to hail Lugar-Lautenberg, you realize just how special the FRESH Act must be.

Thomas Schatz, president of the government-waste organization, "applaud[ed]" the FRESH Act because it "would replace Depression-era farm-subsidy programs with programs that would provide a real safety net for farmers when they need it instead of doling out excessive payments to the wealthiest farmers whether they need them or not."

Said Tim Male, senior scientist at Environmental Defense: "Supporters of current crop subsidies always talk about helping small farms, but the FRESH Act is the only bill that actually walks the walk. By offering revenue insurance to all farmers — no matter what they grow — the FRESH Act would end the current unfair policy of picking favorites among crops and farmers."

FRESH Act would replace a complicated menu of "price triggers," "loan targets" and automatic "direct payments" with a safety net to all commodity-crop farmers that would mitigate the real-world risks that farmers cannot anticipate, including drought and floods. Commodity-crop farmers would not receive payments when "harvests and markets are strong." Unlike the current system, which, according to former Agriculture Committee Chairman Lugar, funneled more than 70 percent ($120 billion) in crop subsidies over the past decade to 6 percent of the farms (even when farm incomes reached record levels), the FRESH Act would provide government-paid insurance policies to the majority of farmers who do not qualify for crop-subsidy programs. These specialty-crop (fruits, vegetables, some livestock and dairy) farmers would receive insurance-provided, safety-net payments whenever a farmer's revenue falls by 20 percent or more from his five-year average.

FRESH Act would do much less to distort international markets. It would also be far more trade-friendly than current subsidy policies, which have wreaked havoc in world trade negotiations, depriving all American consumers of huge benefits from increased trade liberalization. Moreover, the additional water-conservation benefits provided by the FRESH Act will mitigate the water problems that are guaranteed to intensify around the country in the years ahead. If this were not enough, the FRESH Act even makes a token contribution to deficit reduction, taking a step (albeit a small one) in the right direction.

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. House OKs health reform bill
  5. Inside the Beltway
More Top Stories »
  1. Sniper's ex-wife speaks out on abuse
  2. Annandale man killed in hit-and-run
  3. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  4. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  5. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute

Most Shared

  1. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  5. Obama's unlearned lesson
More Top Stories »
  1. NSA surveillance -- of you?
  2. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  3. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute
  4. EDITORIAL: The negative Obama factor
  5. Israelis unsure of U.S. support

Most Commented

  1. House OKs health reform bill
  2. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  3. Muslims stunned by Fort Hood shooting
  4. Furious scramble for health reform support
  5. 'Gentle' Army psychiatrist displayed worrisome signs
More Top Stories »
  1. Obama praises those who ended Fort Hood violence
  2. Army chief wary of backlash against Muslim soldiers
  3. Making fun of faith
  4. Israelis unsure of U.S. support
  5. Obama: It's Senate's turn on health care

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    Washington goes Greek this week

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    Samuels feeling better, hopeful

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.