The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Commentary

    Suicide pact

  • World

    Italian arrests tied to '08 Mumbai attacks

  • Culture

    DESIGN: Exhibits trace decades-old fashion, fabric trends

  • Investigation

    Anglers serve time for black-market rockfish trade

  • World

    Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran

  • Politics

    ANALYSIS: Obama takes a bow, but applause is weak

  • Politics

    Republican governors: 'Opt out' unworkable

Home » Opinion » Editorials

Thursday, April 10, 2008

Quite a LegiStorm

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos

More Editorials Stories

  • EDITORIAL: Death for being a Christian
  • EDITORIAL: Another stimulus
  • EDITORIAL: Schumer's change of heart
  • EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin

By

Disclosure in government frequently discomfits, but it also illuminates and guards the public trust. The latest row over the Capitol Hill Web firm LegiStorm is no different.

Founded in late 2006, LegiStorm offers easy and free public access to the salary information of Capitol Hill staffers. This information is already public record. It used to be difficult to access, but LegiStorm changed that. This year, the firm started to offer much more detailed personal financial disclosure information on senior staffers. Investment portfolios, bank information and home addresses are among them. House staffers have cried foul, citing a fear of identity theft. One went so far as to accuse the company of aiding and abetting the burglary of his home.

Staffers should get used to this level of scrutiny. They should purchase identity-theft protection if they fear fraud or erect window bars to guard against burglars. Those who require private-sector levels of anonymity should decamp to the private sector. The dominance of Capitol Hill by a select group of well-paid staffers commanding legions of twentysomethings is one of Washington's most noteworthy open secrets, one which has begged attention for some time. It is due for a change. We're quite certain that much of the voting public fails to realize how much influence senior staffers, and even some very junior ones, wield. Mr. Smith does not simply go to Washington; his staffers also battle corruption or succumb to it. As the Abramoff lobbying scandal of 2005-06 showed, routines can and do change in the wake of disclosure.

The logic for broad disclosure is compelling. This is the people's branch, and it conducts the people's business. A person sufficiently public-spirited to work in Congress can be expected to show the people some assurances of continuing honorable intent. For certain, this is less invasive than what many low-level employees in federal national-security positions experience during background investigations. It is not easy to be a public servant. Hence the "servant" part.

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Health bill could get 34-hour reading in Senate
  2. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  3. Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
  4. Massive bill steals show in health care debate
  5. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
More Top Stories »
  1. Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Taliban chief hides in Pakistan
  3. 19 gang members face racketeering charges
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Hoffman considering recount claim
  5. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL EXCLUSIVE: On terrorists, Justice recused
  2. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
  3. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  4. Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal
  5. EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin
More Top Stories »
  1. Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
  2. Couples delay divorce, wait out recession
  3. 20-pound, 2,074-page bill steals show
  4. Anglers serve time for black-market rockfish trade
  5. Military academies lack minority nominees

Most Commented

  1. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  2. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  3. Senate Democrats win key vote on health bill
  4. ANALYSIS: Obama takes a bow, but applause is weak
  5. Obama's approval rating falls below 50%
More Top Stories »
  1. Massive bill steals show in health care debate
  2. EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin
  3. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
  4. Military academies lack minority nominees
  5. 20-pound, 2,074-page bill steals show

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Rinehart looks badly hurt

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.