The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > Opinion > Letters

IOU Social Security

By | Thursday, August 21, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

In "Reform Oversights" (Commentary, Sunday) Brandice Canes-Wrone does an in-depth analysis on how Social Security taxes bear disproportionately on two-earner families. This is a good microanalysis of one of the present Social Security tax system's faults.

A bigger problem with our pay-as-you-go Social Security system is that Social Security taxes collected this year are used to pay this year's recipients and the surplus is put into the general fund and spent by Congress on anything it wants.

Social Security has been running large cash income surpluses for more than 20 years and is projected to have surplus cash income until 2017. IOUs are issued for the money borrowed by the government to the Social Security trust fund, which is held in the national debt as money that the government owes itself. Redemption of these IOUs must come from the current budget. We taxpayers contribute to the budget and to date owe ourselves more than $2 trillion.

We citizens have listened to our politicians' sketchy plans to save Social Security. One of these misguided proposals is to raise the cap on Social Security taxes. Increasing Social Security's cash income before 2017 will just accelerate government spending and the national debt.

Social Security has been used unjustly over the years as a fear tactic by our politicians to scare people into paying more taxes. They even have convinced so-called Social Security advocates to fight against changing Social Security in any way.

The first change should be to stop spending the surplus and save and grow it in a real Social Security trust fund.

The bottom line is that Social Security has been Congress' tax revenue "cash cow" for more than 20 years and will continue to be so until 2017. It will be a more generous cash cow if the Social Security tax cap is raised to increase the surplus. Is there anyone in Congress brave enough to put his or her political future on the line to straighten out this mess?

JOHN T. MCVICKAR

Vienna

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

    Most Shared

    1. Powell airs doubts on Obama agenda
    2. Croatia's leader resigns
    3. Obama's spending blitz worries Powell
    4. Fed money may benefit Russian-backed firm
    5. None dare call it Marxism
    6. Holiday marked by anti-tax Tea Parties
    7. Palin to call it quits as Alaska's governor
    8. Rick Warren envisions coalition of faith
    9. Challenges abound for Obama abroad
    10. Gingrich back with a vengeance

    Most Commented

    1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
    2. WH communications director leaving
    3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
    4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
    5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
    6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
    7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
    8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
    9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
    10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

    Poll

    Will you be traveling this 4th of July weekend?

    Market Data

    Advertising Links
    TWT Store
    • e-edition
    • Print Edition
    • Weekly Washington Times
    TWT Affiliates
    • Middle East Times
    • Golf
    • UPI
    • Arbor Ballroom
    • Washington Times Global
    • About TWT
    • Press Room
    • F.A.Q.
    • Work for TWT
    • Advertise
    • Sponsors
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Site Map

    All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.