The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Politics

    Sanford faces 37 charges on state ethics laws

  • Politics

    Lobbyists spending big to shape health care debate

  • National

    Green energy stimulus growing few jobs

  • National

    9/11 defendants eye platform

  • Entertainment

    Jackson wins 4 American Music Awards

  • Politics

    Unemployment taxes hit small firms hard

  • Sports

    Redskins' loss like a kick in the gut

Home » Opinion » Letters

Thursday, August 21, 2008

IOU Social Security

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos

More Letters Stories

  • LETTER TO EDITOR: The new ICE age
  • LETTER TO EDITOR: National security in the heat of the moment
  • LETTER TO EDITOR: Making amends for what one spends
  • LETTER TO EDITOR: The bore and chore of war

By

In "Reform Oversights" (Commentary, Sunday) Brandice Canes-Wrone does an in-depth analysis on how Social Security taxes bear disproportionately on two-earner families. This is a good microanalysis of one of the present Social Security tax system's faults.

A bigger problem with our pay-as-you-go Social Security system is that Social Security taxes collected this year are used to pay this year's recipients and the surplus is put into the general fund and spent by Congress on anything it wants.

Social Security has been running large cash income surpluses for more than 20 years and is projected to have surplus cash income until 2017. IOUs are issued for the money borrowed by the government to the Social Security trust fund, which is held in the national debt as money that the government owes itself. Redemption of these IOUs must come from the current budget. We taxpayers contribute to the budget and to date owe ourselves more than $2 trillion.

We citizens have listened to our politicians' sketchy plans to save Social Security. One of these misguided proposals is to raise the cap on Social Security taxes. Increasing Social Security's cash income before 2017 will just accelerate government spending and the national debt.

Social Security has been used unjustly over the years as a fear tactic by our politicians to scare people into paying more taxes. They even have convinced so-called Social Security advocates to fight against changing Social Security in any way.

The first change should be to stop spending the surplus and save and grow it in a real Social Security trust fund.

The bottom line is that Social Security has been Congress' tax revenue "cash cow" for more than 20 years and will continue to be so until 2017. It will be a more generous cash cow if the Social Security tax cap is raised to increase the surplus. Is there anyone in Congress brave enough to put his or her political future on the line to straighten out this mess?

JOHN T. MCVICKAR

Vienna

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Massive bill steals show in health care debate
  2. Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal
  3. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
  4. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  5. EDITORIAL EXCLUSIVE: On terrorists, Justice recused
More Top Stories »
  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Hoffman considering recount claim
  3. Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
  4. EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin
  5. Report: ACORN mismanaged grant money

Most Shared

  1. Ego of 'O': It's all about him
  2. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  3. Green energy stimulus growing few jobs
  4. Unemployment taxes hit small firms hard
  5. EDITORIAL EXCLUSIVE: On terrorists, Justice recused
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Death for being a Christian
  2. EDITORIAL: Schumer's change of heart
  3. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
  4. VMI faces probe into sexism
  5. Company that repaired Chairman Gray's house lacked license

Most Commented

  1. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  2. ANALYSIS: Obama takes a bow, but applause is weak
  3. Senate Democrats win key vote on health bill
  4. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
  5. EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin
More Top Stories »
  1. Lobbyists spending big to shape health care debate
  2. Schumer: Dems will pass health bill alone
  3. Green energy stimulus growing few jobs
  4. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  5. EDITORIAL: Schumer's change of heart

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Mason returns

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.