The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Commentary

    Suicide pact

  • World

    Italian arrests tied to '08 Mumbai attacks

  • Culture

    DESIGN: Exhibits trace decades-old fashion, fabric trends

  • Investigation

    Anglers serve time for black-market rockfish trade

  • World

    Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran

  • Politics

    ANALYSIS: Obama takes a bow, but applause is weak

  • Politics

    Republican governors: 'Opt out' unworkable

Home » News » Wire Columns

Monday, December 1, 2008

EDITORIAL: Big Three on energy

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Videos
Subscribe to this story's comments

Cornelius

If I want a fuel efficient, hybrid car, I can buy a Prius. What makes Congress think that if the Big Three make hybrids, then I would rush out to buy one of theirs instead of a proven one. If I want a truck or SUV, I'll buy an American vehicle. They are excellent machines. It seems that Congress wants to force American auto makers to only make vehicles that their competitors make, and at this point, make better. That's a sure way to immediate bankruptcy. It would be like forcing Macy's to sell only what WalMart sells. Then we wouldn't need Macy's, would we? If Congress forces the Big (Shrinking) Three to sell just what Toyota is already successful at, we won't need them either, will we? Leave the American companies alone. Let them make whatever cars they want. Don't bail them out. If they fail, there are cars made in Tenessee and Kentucky that Americans can buy.
Mark as offensive

RDH

With the UAW historically demanding every dollar they can get (and that's the American way), it is no wonder that American auto companies have spent less on R&D. No one wants to own a company that does not make money and one way to keep up the bottom line in the short-term is to cut R&D. Cornelius has some good points. Unfortunately due to CAFE standards, a US auto company cannot simply build the vehicles it can make money on. They have to also build vehicles that make up for the "poor" fuel efficiency of their SUVs and trucks even though they are poor sellers. We cannot just blame the UAW. With GM part of the problem may be with the company. For example, why is there a line of Chevy trucks AND an analogous line of GM trucks? Why can I find Pontiac, Buick and Chevy vehicles that are essentially the same? It seems like some consolidation is now in order. Trimming should not be the only difference between a GM and Chevy truck if it costs more to manufacture two different brands of the same truck (and I don't know if it does or not). Or is it against "UAW rules" for GM to quit manufacturing so many different but essentially identical vehicles?
Mark as offensive

kltuttle

Do you really think environmental advocates have the technical expertise to make the claims you noted? Part of what is wrong in Detroit is that management tried to respond to environmental advocates. Have you noticed that European Diesel powered cars are missing from the market but American Diesel powered trucks and pickups are still on the market? If not, you don't follow this very closely. The contemp you feel for some hybrids, I feel for all current hybrids and would like to point out that with a single exception that I know of, all environmental improvements on cars today were invented or developed by American automotive manufacturers.
Mark as offensive

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Health bill could get 34-hour reading in Senate
  2. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  3. Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
  4. Massive bill steals show in health care debate
  5. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
More Top Stories »
  1. Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Taliban chief hides in Pakistan
  3. 19 gang members face racketeering charges
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Hoffman considering recount claim
  5. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL EXCLUSIVE: On terrorists, Justice recused
  2. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
  3. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  4. EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin
  5. Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal
More Top Stories »
  1. Anglers serve time for black-market rockfish trade
  2. Couples delay divorce, wait out recession
  3. Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
  4. 20-pound, 2,074-page bill steals show
  5. Military academies lack minority nominees

Most Commented

  1. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  2. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  3. ANALYSIS: Obama takes a bow, but applause is weak
  4. Senate Democrats win key vote on health bill
  5. Obama's approval rating falls below 50%
More Top Stories »
  1. Massive bill steals show in health care debate
  2. EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin
  3. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
  4. Military academies lack minority nominees
  5. 20-pound, 2,074-page bill steals show

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Rinehart looks badly hurt

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.