The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Health

    Obama fights obesity with executive power

  • Investigation

    Stimulus foes see value in seeking cash

  • Politics

    President's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent

  • Security

    Ayatollah: Iran's military will 'punch' West

  • Politics

    Rep. Murtha dies at age 77

  • Security

    Army warned about jihadist threat in '08

  • Politics

    New federal office for global warming

Home » Opinion

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

BLACKWELL: Obama justice

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

Race, judges and future elections

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
Please stand by, images loading!
  • ASSOCIATED PRESS
Attorney General-designate Eric H. Holder Jr. faces tough questioning at his confirmation hearing in the Senate by Republicans who question the veracity of his testimony in 2001 about President Clinton's pardon of fugitive Marc Rich.

More Opinion Stories

  • Thinking resolutions through
  • HOEKSTRA: Fort Hood shooting must be probed ASAP
  • FRIST: Saving children's lives
  • LETTER TO EDITOR: Maryland's future is green

By Ken Blackwell

OP-ED:

The 2010 midterm elections and the resulting battles over redistricting will shape the future of both political parties. A case challenging the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) is being offered to the Supreme Court, highlighting these political stakes. And President-elect Barack Obama's Justice Department is about to take center stage in this fight.

The Constitution requires legislative districts be redrawn after each decennial national census. The 2010 midterm elections will determine the makeup of all 50 state legislatures. With few exceptions, these legislatures will then draw new lines of all congressional districts, as well as many state legislative districts, for the 2012 election and beyond.

A major factor in this redistricting is the Voting Rights Act. A number of VRA's provisions apply nationwide, originally designed to protect the right of African Americans to vote. But another provision of the law has been challenged in a case that has now been offered to the U.S. Supreme Court. Section Five of the VRA requires certain jurisdictions with a history of egregious racism to go through a special process before they can make any changes affecting voting.

Under Section Five, these jurisdictions must get pre-clearance from the U.S. Justice Department before they can redistrict or make any other changes to their election laws or procedures, or get a three-judge panel of the federal district court in D.C. to sign off on the jurisdiction's plan. The law requires the Justice Department or the federal court to determine whether the changes would have either the purpose or the effect of abridging the right to vote.

But as racial barriers to voting have fallen in America, and the African American vote has become increasingly reliable as a voting bloc for Democrats, VRA lawsuits have increasingly been used to advantage the Democrats in partisan wrangling against Republicans.

The VRA was originally passed in 1965. This was the height of the civil rights movement, when powerful forces were arrayed to prevent black voters from casting ballots, and where a number of states saw widespread voter intimidation. Today America is a different place. For years now, African Americans have served in Congress, served as federal judges, on the Supreme Court, and in the Cabinet. And now an African American has been elected president of the United States. America is a far different place today than it was in 1965.

Yet, Mr. Obama has nominated Eric Holder as attorney general of the United States. Mr. Holder has liberal views of what constitutes "civil rights," including election law issues and redistricting issues subject to VRA. How will Mr. Holder deal with these VRA issues? Does America still need draconian laws that were passed to combat endemic racism and overt hostility? Will Mr. Holder use the power of Section Five to strike down redistricting plans, hoping to force districting lines that will be more favorable to Democrats?

Additionally, Mr. Obama has promised to nominate activist judges to our nation's courts, and he has a Democrat-controlled Senate that will likely confirm anyone he nominates. Mr. Holder will be one of his top advisors on whom to nominate. How much damage could result from a liberal attorney general pushing partisan advantage in redistricting processes, with any legal challenges to those actions being decided by equally liberal, Obama-appointed judges?

These are critical questions. Republicans are on the ropes. Democrats control majorities in both houses of Congress, and now the White House. And a liberal Democrat will be deciding VRA issues at the Obama Justice Department. There will be a strong push by some to use these levers of power to get redistricting plans that will only increase Democrat control for the next decade.

This country has clearly progressed beyond yesterday's racism. And the law should not give one party an overwhelming advantage to invoke the mistakes of the past for partisan advantage.

Ken Blackwell is the senior fellow for Family Empowerment at the Family Research Council, and a former chairman of the U.S. Census Monitoring Board.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Va. Senate OKs ban on sexual orientation bias
  2. LYNCH: Drug czar should go
  3. Storm could put Super Bowl fans in dark
  4. Ayatollah: Iran's military will 'punch' West
  5. Clinton: Islamist terror is No. 1 threat
More Top Stories »
  1. Oh snow! Another storm approaches
  2. President's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent
  3. Super snow Sunday: Region digs out from 'historic' storm
  4. Obama rallies glum Dems amid GOP woes
  5. Prop. 8 trial stirs questions, emotions

Most Shared

  1. Army warned about jihadist threat in '08
  2. BLANKLEY: Palin delivers sparkle, warmth
  3. STEYN: The 'corpseman' cometh
  4. New federal office for global warming
  5. President's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent
More Top Stories »
  1. Ayatollah: Iran's military will 'punch' West
  2. Stimulus foes see value in seeking cash
  3. PRUDEN: Hatching the Silly Bowl
  4. EDITORIAL: Free the Baptist 10 in Haiti
  5. Va. Senate OKs ban on sexual orientation bias

Most Commented

  1. Palin: President run may be 'right thing'
  2. Clinton: Islamist terror is No. 1 threat
  3. New federal office for global warming
  4. President's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent
  5. Obama to host televised, bipartisan meeting on health care
More Top Stories »
  1. Aide: Stop criticizing anti-terror effort
  2. Obama rallies glum Dems amid GOP woes
  3. Prop. 8 trial stirs questions, emotions
  4. Rep. Murtha dies at age 77
  5. LYNCH: Drug czar should go

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Question of the day

What was your favorite Super Bowl ad?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    White House communications chief to treat Fox differently than ABC, NBC

  • Belief Blog

    Anglican day of reckoning coming

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    (Almost) All about Apple's iPad

  • Redskins 360

    This is goodbye ... for now

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.