The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Business

    Toyota's bumpy ride began with race for growth

  • Security

    Chinese see U.S. debt as weapon in Taiwan dispute

  • World

    Obama ratchets up Iran sanctions threat

  • National

    Mid-Atlantic braces for new wallop of snow

  • Business

    European economies facing grim times

  • Politics

    Obama rejects starting over on health care

  • Politics

    Illegal immigration fell sharply in '08

Home » Opinion » Commentary

Sunday, July 20, 2008

KUHNER: Bush's Iran U-turn

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
Please stand by, images loading!

More Commentary Stories

  • FORTENBERRY: Protesters are key to halting nuclear designs
  • BERES: Concluding the sanctions comedy
  • BINLEY: Iran revolution needs support
  • RAHN: Where is the inflation?

By

COMMENTARY:

The Bush administration's decision to send a top U.S. diplomat, William Burns, to meet with Iran's chief nuclear negotiator at a European Union-led meeting in Switzerland is a victory for Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

The White House insists the move does not signify a change in policy toward Tehran. Washington has vowed it will not negotiate with Iran over its nuclear program until it temporarily suspends uranium enrichment. The White House claims the meeting is "a one-time U.S. participation," and that Mr. Burns - the State Department's third-highest ranking diplomat - will only "listen, not negotiate." This is irrelevant.

The Burns mission gives Mr. Ahmadinejad the one thing he needs: time. Placing U.S. policy on a diplomatic track allows Mr. Ahmadinejad to prolong the negotiating process. This enables Tehran to obfuscate, deceive and confuse the international community. Iran is not interested in genuine talks; rather, it is using the guise of diplomacy - just as Adolf Hitler did to rearm Germany during the 1930s - to build a nuclear arsenal.

Mr. Ahmadinejad claims Iran craves nuclear energy for civilian purposes only. This is a lie. Tehran possesses the world's second largest natural-gas reserves and the fifth largest crude-oil reserves. It has no need for domestic nuclear power.

Moreover, if that was the regime's genuine intent, it would not have endured international isolation and crippling sanctions for the last six years. Iran would have allowed the United Nations full and immediate access to its nuclear sites.

The U.S. and its European partners have repeatedly stressed they support Tehran having peaceful nuclear energy. Instead of transparency, however, Iran has blocked the U.N.'s watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), at every turn.

In May, the IAEA said Tehran's behavior remains bellicose and troubling: Its uranium enrichment program continues; it refuses to explain evidence of designs for underground testing facilities; it conducts tests of explosive detonators often used for nuclear weapons; it has revamped the Shahab-3 missile to be able to carry a nuclear warhead; and most ominously, it is employing nuclear scientists who are actively studying how America detonated its first plutonium bomb in 1945.

If Iran gets the nuclear bomb the results will be cataclysmic - for Israel, the Middle East and the United States. Mr. Ahmadinejad is a revolutionary Shi'ite mystic, whose goal is to create a global Muslim empire. He has vowed to "wipe Israel off the map." His dream is a "world without America." Like Hitler, Mr. Ahmadinejad is a fanatic. He sees himself as divinely ordained to bring about the 12th imam or the "Mahdi," which according to fundamentalist Shi'ite theology will usher in an apocalypse leading to a universal caliphate.

Iran is a clerical, fascist state. It fosters state-sanctioned anti-Semitism. It supports Islamist groups, such as Hezbollah and Hamas. It seeks to destabilize Lebanon. It has transformed Syria into a political vassal. It funds and trains insurgents operating in Iraq in order to murder American soldiers and force a humiliating U.S. retreat.

The fatal flaw in the European Union's and State Department's approach is the assumption that Iran is a conventional Mideast power seeking the traditional objectives of enhanced geopolitical prestige and influence - a sort of revived Persian empire with a Shi'ite snarl. In fact, the very opposite is true: Iran is a revolutionary power bent on making the Middle East - and eventually, the world - safe for radical Islam. Tehran's aim is not only to dominate the region, but to annihilate its enemies.

If Iran obtains nuclear weapons, a regional arms race will be triggered. This will greatly increase the chances that Islamic terrorists will get their hands on weapons of mass destruction. Moreover, a military showdown with Israel will be inevitable. Mr. Ahmadinejad will not sit back and allow Tehran's nukes to serve as a strategic deterrent: He will use them in a devastating first strike against Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. His warped Shi'ite mythology demands that the Jews be driven out from the Middle East - even if millions of Israelis and Iranians are killed in the process.

America needs to put the military option front and center. Mr. Ahmadinejad should be offered a stark choice: End Iran's nuclear drive or face regime change. Nothing else will stop him from wreaking havoc on his people and the world.

Jeffrey T. Kuhner is a columnist for The Washington Times.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Stimulus foes see value in seeking cash
  2. Va. Senate OKs ban on sexual orientation bias
  3. Another storm approaches Mid-Atlantic
  4. Obama's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent
  5. Ayatollah: Iran's military will 'punch' West
More Top Stories »
  1. LYNCH: Drug czar should go
  2. Clinton: Islamist terror is No. 1 threat
  3. Md. may fine for piercing minors without parental OK
  4. Prop. 8 trial stirs questions, emotions
  5. Inside the Beltway

Most Shared

  1. Stimulus foes see value in seeking cash
  2. BLANKLEY: Palin delivers sparkle, warmth
  3. Army warned about jihadist threat in '08
  4. New federal office for global warming
  5. STEYN: The 'corpseman' cometh
More Top Stories »
  1. Drive down debt, or we will be driven down
  2. Ayatollah: Iran's military will 'punch' West
  3. PRUDEN: Hatching the Silly Bowl
  4. Obama's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent
  5. EDITORIAL: Free the Baptist 10 in Haiti

Most Commented

  1. Obama's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent
  2. Palin: President run may be 'right thing'
  3. Clinton: Islamist terror is No. 1 threat
  4. New federal office for global warming
  5. BLANKLEY: Palin delivers sparkle, warmth
More Top Stories »
  1. Rep. Murtha dies at age 77
  2. Prop. 8 trial stirs questions, emotions
  3. EDITORIAL: Free the Baptist 10 in Haiti
  4. Ayatollah: Iran's military will 'punch' West
  5. Blacks face Senate shutout in 2011

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Question of the day

What was your favorite Super Bowl ad?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    White House communications chief to treat Fox differently than ABC, NBC

  • Belief Blog

    Anglican day of reckoning coming

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    (Almost) All about Apple's iPad

  • Redskins 360

    This is goodbye ... for now

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.