The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Sports

    Offense erupts in Caps' victory

  • National

    KUHNHENN: 10% jobless rate is Obama's troubling world

  • World

    Joint forces probe NATO air strike

  • National

    Fla. shooting suspect 'mentally ill'

  • Business

    Parents buying homes for kids at college

  • Politics

    Looking to 2010, GOP focuses on fiscal restraint

  • National

    Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate

Home » Opinion » Commentary

Sunday, May 4, 2008

Halt strategic oil buys

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos

More Commentary Stories

  • Democrats sent reeling
  • BOOK REVIEW: Saudi life seen in wider context
  • Close the verification gap
  • A great day for liberty

By

According to AAA, the average retail price of regular, unleaded gasoline reached $3.50 per gallon last week. The average price of diesel fuel is even worse — $4.20 per gallon.

Consumers face inflationary pressures at the pump, at the airline ticket counter and from the cost of transporting goods. Worse yet, the summer driving season hasn"t started.

Today"s oil prices generally reflect supply and demand. Underneath these market fundamentals, however, are several contributors to the unprecedented prices.

Growing world economies, particularly in India and China, are boosting world demand. Increased environmental regulations, geopolitical tensions and the weak U.S. dollar also contribute. In markets with limited supply, effects are even more dramatic and uncertain.

Federal government policies should not make things worse. That"s why I am sponsoring legislation that calls for temporary suspension of federal oil purchases for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, or SPR.

Future federal acquisitions would be triggered when the price of regular, unleaded gasoline is less than a nationwide average of $2.50 per gallon or diesel fuel returns to an average of $2.75 for four weeks.

S. 2927, would also ensure future government oil purchases are fiscally responsible. These common sense proposals follow recommendations by the Government Accountability Office (GAO).

The SPR was initially created in the mid-1970s to protect the nation from oil-supply disruptions following the Arab oil embargo. I think we all can agree on the goal of protecting America"s energy security.

The SPR already contains 700 million barrels of oil in the salt caverns of Louisiana and Texas. Under current policy, the federal government acquires another 70,000 barrels of oil each and every day to inject underground.

While there is disagreement about the total impact to consumers, it is clear these federal acquisitions have a definite impact on price. The administrator of the Energy Information Administration recently testified that EIA modeling shows a reduction of 100,000 barrels of oil per day has an impact of $2 per barrel and 4 cents to 5 cents per gallon. Other analysts have argued that continuing to fill SPR could add as much as 10 percent to the price of oil.

12Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. Sniper's ex-wife speaks out on abuse
  3. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute
  4. Inside the Beltway
  5. Armored troop carriers called unsafe for duty
More Top Stories »
  1. 13 killed at Texas army base; psychiatrist accused
  2. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  3. Army: Suspect said 'Allahu Akbar!' before shooting
  4. Can the 10th Amendment save us?
  5. 60 Plus leader: Senior 'tsunami' coming

Most Shared

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  3. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  4. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  5. Making fun of faith
More Top Stories »
  1. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  2. Obama's new world order
  3. EDITORIAL: The grass roots keep growing
  4. NSA surveillance -- of you?
  5. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute

Most Commented

  1. Army: Suspect said 'Allahu Akbar!' before shooting
  2. Muslims stunned by Fort Hood shooting
  3. Furious scramble for health reform support
  4. 'Gentle' Army psychiatrist displayed worrisome signs
  5. 13 killed at Texas army base; psychiatrist accused
More Top Stories »
  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute
  3. House OKs health reform bill
  4. Obama praises those who ended Fort Hood violence
  5. House majority leader warns of health bill delays

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    Washington goes Greek this week

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    He Said, She Said Week 9

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.