The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Politics

    Lobbyists spending big to shape health care debate

  • National

    Green energy stimulus growing few jobs

  • National

    9/11 defendants eye platform

  • Entertainment

    Jackson wins 4 American Music Awards

  • Politics

    Unemployment taxes hit small firms hard

  • Sports

    Redskins' loss like a kick in the gut

  • Politics

    Dem senators at odds over health bill

Home » Opinion » Editorials

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Conyers' wallets

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos
Please stand by, images loading!
  • Rep. John Conyers, Michigan Democrat

More Editorials Stories

  • EDITORIAL: Death for being a Christian
  • EDITORIAL: Another stimulus
  • EDITORIAL: Schumer's change of heart
  • EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin

By Eric Grover

Americans avail themselves of an abundance of credit, debit and prepay card products.That's what choice is all about. But changes are in the wind on Capitol Hill.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers recently began hearings on the Credit Card Fair Fee Act of 2008. It's a price-control bill, though Mr. Conyers makes claims it would enhance competition. The bill would do precisely the opposite. It also would hurt consumers and small shops because Big Brother would become intricately involved in pricing matters.

The legislation calls for, among other things, three "Electronic Payment Systems Judges" who, as pricing czars, would divine what merchants would be charged by MasterCard and Visa, and they would objectively divine this information via a "hypothetical perfectly competitive market." In 2010, their determination would become a uniform price cap for all merchants regardless of size or risk. Retailers could continue to negotiate singly or collectively for better terms.

Some of the bill's supporters cite the regulations in other nations tobuttress their own lobbying. For example,Australia's central bank reduced merchant interchange fees and permitted merchants to levy surcharges on card purchases. The impact on consumers included higher cardholder fees and fewer card rewards. Merchants also tacked on additional charges, and that consequently led to reduced credit-card-transaction growth. (The European Union regulators also pine for increased red tape and a whiff of protectionist sentiment is in the air, too.)

Is there a problem stateside that needs fixing? American consumers and merchants have enormous choice. Each stage in American credit card payments is market-driven - from card issuance to merchant payment - although networks were another matter. A quarter-century ago, all the principal card payment networks except American Express were owned by banks and not for profit.

However, there's been a sea change.In 2004. a a lawsuit fled by the Justice Department ended MasterCard and Visa's prohibitions on "member" banks participating in Amex and Discover. Since then, Morgan Stanley divested Discover and banks spun off MasterCard and Visa.

Today, the U.S. card-payment-network market is the most competitive in the world and becoming more so. EU regulators worry about having only two pan-European card-payment networks, one of which, Visa EU, remains a bank association. In the U.S there are four full-suite networks: Amex, Discover, MasterCard and Visa; national debit networks Star and NYCE; and PayPal; all of which are commercial enterprises independent of banks.

Now look at the contrast, notwithstanding China's trade commitments to open up its domestic market, China UnionPay enjoys a protected domestic card-payment-network monopoly. In Brazil, RedeCard and VisaNet have monopolies acquiring MasterCard and Visa transactions, respectively. Building payment-networking is difficult.

Nevertheless, the industry continues to attract capital and entrepreneurs. Companies like Revolution Money and Tempo are competing to drive down merchant fees, and firms likeInterchange manage to maximize value for all network participants.

Yet Mr. Conyers contends merchants are "forced" to accept payment cards. That's nonsense. Cash is the only payment merchants are compelled to accept. In fact, 7 million merchants each year choose to accept credit/debit/payment cards because they provide value, and that number is expected to grow by 9 percent in the near future.

Mr.Conyers argues MasterCard and Visa are associations "owned and controlled" by banks, implying collective price setting and an anti-trust issue. How wrong he is. The fact of the matter is that the payment networks sell their products to banks but are not controlled by banks.

American consumers will be harmed by the Credit Card Fair Fee Act because it is seeded in price controls and price controls cause shortages, reduce competition and innovation, and consequently force consumers to dip further into their wallets. And what about small, nontraditional merchants? Have the supporters of the legislation even considered how they would fare? What would their profit margins look like? Government regulating credit-, debit- and payment-card fees? Consumers beware. "Fair" isn't always fair.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Massive bill steals show in health care debate
  2. Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal
  3. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
  4. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  5. EDITORIAL EXCLUSIVE: On terrorists, Justice recused
More Top Stories »
  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Hoffman considering recount claim
  3. Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
  4. EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin
  5. Report: ACORN mismanaged grant money

Most Shared

  1. Ego of 'O': It's all about him
  2. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  3. EDITORIAL EXCLUSIVE: On terrorists, Justice recused
  4. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
  5. Green energy stimulus growing few jobs
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Schumer's change of heart
  2. EDITORIAL: Death for being a Christian
  3. Unemployment taxes hit small firms hard
  4. EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin
  5. VMI faces probe into sexism

Most Commented

  1. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  2. ANALYSIS: Obama takes a bow, but applause is weak
  3. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  4. Senate Democrats win key vote on health bill
  5. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
More Top Stories »
  1. Massive bill steals show in health care debate
  2. EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin
  3. Lobbyists spending big to shape health care debate
  4. Military academies lack minority nominees
  5. Green energy stimulus growing few jobs

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    The weekly Redskins injury roundup

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.