The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Sports

    Offense erupts in Caps' victory

  • National

    KUHNHENN: 10% jobless rate is Obama's troubling world

  • World

    Joint forces probe NATO air strike

  • National

    Fla. shooting suspect 'mentally ill'

  • Business

    Parents buying homes for kids at college

  • Politics

    Looking to 2010, GOP focuses on fiscal restraint

  • National

    Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate

Home » Opinion

Friday, September 12, 2008

ANDRES: Health care and the election

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

Costs, not coverage, a concern for most voters

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos

More Opinion Stories

  • FRIST: Saving children's lives
  • LETTER TO EDITOR: Maryland's future is green
  • TELLA: Politics and the Fed
  • EDITORIAL: Congressional Motors

By Gary Andres

Despite a slowing economy and rising energy costs, healthcare still ranks among voters' top concerns as the November election approaches. While voters convey some clear general preferences about the issue, confusion exists about its details and where the two presidential candidates stand on the topic. These gaps in public knowledge make the bridge between citizen opinion and public policy-making particularly challenging. Those are some findings from the most recent American Survey, conducted Aug. 18-22 (800 registered voters, +/-3.5 margin of error).

First, voters clearly prefer a focus on containing health-care costs compared to covering more of the uninsured, according to the survey. When asked to choose between, "making healthcare more affordable or having fewer people without health insurance," lowering costs overwhelmingly trumps broader insurance coverage, 83 percent to 9 percent. As the chart above demonstrates, this preference holds irrespective of party identification. These results are consistent with other public polls — such as those done by the Kaiser Family Foundation — demonstrating that over the past 15 years, public concern over health-care costs has risen compared to worries about the number of uninsured.

But registered voters also display confusion when it comes to the details and implications of health-care reform policies. While a plurality (40 percent) believes having more people with health-insurance coverage would cause rates to go down, nearly one out of three (28 percent) thinks broader coverage would make insurance rates go up. Twenty-two percent say rates would stay the same if more people had insurance.

Registered voters also exhibit limited knowledge about the specifics of the presidential candidates' health-care plans. Sixty-five percent say they have heard "not much" or "nothing at all" about Sen. John McCain's health-care plan, while 50 percent say that about Sen. Barack Obama's plan.

This lack of awareness is highlighted again with answers to another question, probing further about policy details. When we asked respondents which of the two major candidates "plans to offer a direct refundable tax credit of $2500 for individuals and $5000 for families to offset the cost of health insurance" (the centerpiece of the McCain plan), 33 percent attribute this plan to Mr. Obama, 27 percent to Mr. McCain and 33 percent say they do not know.

These results all underscore a critical caveat when it comes to public-policy polling. Despite voters registering serious concern about an issue, they often don't know a lot about the specifics, creating a fertile environment to shape the debate through aggressive messaging. When it comes to health care, it seems both sides have some opportunities, but also some work to do.

  • Gary Andres, who served in the first Bush administration, is vice chairman of Dutko Worldwide.

  • [Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
    Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

    Post a comment

    There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

    Please login or register to post a comment

    Ask a Question

    You Report

    Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

    Top Stories

    Most Read

    1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
    2. Sniper's ex-wife speaks out on abuse
    3. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute
    4. Inside the Beltway
    5. Armored troop carriers called unsafe for duty
    More Top Stories »
    1. 13 killed at Texas army base; psychiatrist accused
    2. Parents buying homes for kids at college
    3. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
    4. Army: Suspect said 'Allahu Akbar!' before shooting
    5. Can the 10th Amendment save us?

    Most Shared

    1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
    2. Parents buying homes for kids at college
    3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
    4. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
    5. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
    More Top Stories »
    1. Obama's unlearned lesson
    2. EDITORIAL: The grass roots keep growing
    3. Israelis unsure of U.S. support
    4. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute
    5. Looking to 2010, GOP focuses on fiscal restraint

    Most Commented

    1. House OKs health reform bill
    2. Muslims stunned by Fort Hood shooting
    3. Furious scramble for health reform support
    4. 'Gentle' Army psychiatrist displayed worrisome signs
    5. Army: Suspect said 'Allahu Akbar!' before shooting
    More Top Stories »
    1. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
    2. Obama praises those who ended Fort Hood violence
    3. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
    4. House majority leader warns of health bill delays
    5. Making fun of faith

    Listen to Washington Times Radio

    • America's Morning News

      with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

    Question of the day

    White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

    Blogs & Columns

    • POTUS Notes

      New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

    • The Back Story

      12 arrested at Pelosi's office

    • Belief Blog

      Washington goes Greek this week

    • Out of Context

      Foods that might kill libido

    • Technology

      Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

    • On the Fly

      United lifts some 'award' blocking

    • Redskins 360

      He Said, She Said Week 9

    • Tara's Two Cents

      On their way to summer vacation..

    • SNOBlog

      Beyond 'Woody'

    Videos

    Advertising Links
    TWT Store
    • e-edition
    • Print Edition
    • Weekly Washington Times
    TWT Affiliates
    • Middle East Times
    • Golf
    • UPI
    • Arbor Ballroom
    • Washington Times Global
    • About TWT
    • Press Room
    • F.A.Q.
    • Work for TWT
    • Advertise
    • Sponsors
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Site Map

    All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.