The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Business

    Toyota's bumpy ride began with race for growth

  • Security

    Chinese see U.S. debt as weapon in Taiwan dispute

  • World

    Obama ratchets up Iran sanctions threat

  • National

    Mid-Atlantic braces for new wallop of snow

  • Business

    European economies facing grim times

  • Politics

    Obama rejects starting over on health care

  • Politics

    Illegal immigration fell sharply in '08

Home » News » Wire Columns

Monday, January 26, 2009

PARKER: Responsibility for life

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
Please stand by, images loading!
  • Associated Press
A crowd in Montpelier, Vt., get an early start Saturday in the annual Roe v. Wade marches across the nation. The pro-lifers marched to the State House to protest President Obama's perceived policy on abortion, which could lead to eased regulations.

More Wire Columns Stories

  • ROMper ROOM: Learn to spell with Wolverine
  • VAULTS: Risk pays off for 'Nun's Story'
  • ROMper ROOM: Review of 'Challenge Me: Math Workout'
  • ROMper ROOM: Review of Gold's Gym Workout

By Star Parker

COMMENTARY:

In these uncertain times, some things remain constant. One is the arrival each Jan. 22 of tens of thousands of pro-life Americans to Washington, D.C., to note the anniversary of the Roe v. Wade decision and to mourn.

Forty eight million American children, given the gift of life, but deprived of seeing the light of day, have been destroyed in the womb since that 22nd of January in 1973 when the U.S. Supreme Court legalized abortion. So, again this year they came.

Change really is not such a new idea in America. They have been coming to Washington seeking change now for 36 years. But apparently the change they want is not change our new president can believe in.

Unlike his predecessor, who annually addressed the shivering crowd, Mr. Obama declined their invitation to speak. However, he issued a brief press statement, not about change but about the status quo - celebrating the 1973 decision.

Maybe our first black president doesn't know that, despite blacks being just 12 percent of the American population, black babies constitute 37 percent of all our aborted children: 1 of every 2 black pregnancies is aborted.

In the words of my friend, the Rev. Clenard Childress, "the most dangerous place for an African-American to be is in the womb of their African-American mother."

According to Mr. Obama's statement, Roe v Wade was about "reproductive freedom" and a "woman's right to choose" and our "daughters" having "the same rights ... as our sons." What responsibilities go with these "rights" Mr. President? And do we have ultimate responsibilities? And if so, to whom?

In his Inaugural address, Mr. Obama appealed for "a new era of responsibility," bemoaned "greed and irresponsibility" and "failure to make hard choices." But, Mr. President, if you condone a culture that has no sense of awe and responsibility toward the greatest of all miracles and mysteries - life itself - how can you expect responsibility elsewhere?

The president's statement proposes to "reduce" abortions by expanding "access to affordable contraception, accurate health information, and preventative services." But if there is no problem in destroying the unborn child, why is reducing abortions a goal? If it is OK to do it once, why not 20 times? Or a million times a year, like now?

And, sir, will you continue to force us taxpayers to pay for the "unintended" consequences of women exercising their "reproductive freedom"?

Can it be accidental that along with the millions of abortions that followed the Roe v. Wade decision, the stability of American families spiraled downward, divorce rates increased, and out-of-wedlock birthrates skyrocketed to where today 4 in 10 babies are born to unwed mothers?

As columnist Thomas Sowell has pointed out, as late as 1970 most black children were raised in two-parent families. By 1995, one-third were.

For those who claim Christian conservatives care only about abortion and gay marriage and are indifferent to social issues such as poverty, know that they are all one and the same issue.

The black poverty rate, which has been frozen at twice the national average for decades, is almost exclusively a phenomenon of single-parent homes. Black families with two married parents at home are on approximate economic par with white families.

According to the most recent report on sexually transmitted diseases from the Center for Disease Control, these diseases are increasing and spreading in our nation. Blacks account, depending on the disease, for between 50 percent and 70 percent of them.

No, this is not about "reproductive freedom." This about respect for life, for others, and a true culture of responsibility. What can be done?

Understand that our crisis is one of values. Restore law that protects all life. And free at-risk children from the tyranny of government schools where they are taught moral relativism. Allow these children the freedom to go to church schools.

Meanwhile, Mr. President, we'll see you again next Jan. 22.

Star Parker is a nationally syndicated columnist, author and president of CURE, Coalition on Urban Renewal and Education (www.urban cure.org).

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Stimulus foes see value in seeking cash
  2. Va. Senate OKs ban on sexual orientation bias
  3. Another storm approaches Mid-Atlantic
  4. Obama's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent
  5. Ayatollah: Iran's military will 'punch' West
More Top Stories »
  1. LYNCH: Drug czar should go
  2. Clinton: Islamist terror is No. 1 threat
  3. Md. may fine for piercing minors without parental OK
  4. Prop. 8 trial stirs questions, emotions
  5. Army warned about jihadist threat in '08

Most Shared

  1. Stimulus foes see value in seeking cash
  2. BLANKLEY: Palin delivers sparkle, warmth
  3. Army warned about jihadist threat in '08
  4. New federal office for global warming
  5. STEYN: The 'corpseman' cometh
More Top Stories »
  1. Drive down debt, or we will be driven down
  2. Ayatollah: Iran's military will 'punch' West
  3. PRUDEN: Hatching the Silly Bowl
  4. Obama's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent
  5. EDITORIAL: Free the Baptist 10 in Haiti

Most Commented

  1. Obama's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent
  2. Palin: President run may be 'right thing'
  3. New federal office for global warming
  4. Clinton: Islamist terror is No. 1 threat
  5. BLANKLEY: Palin delivers sparkle, warmth
More Top Stories »
  1. Rep. Murtha dies at age 77
  2. Prop. 8 trial stirs questions, emotions
  3. EDITORIAL: Free the Baptist 10 in Haiti
  4. Ayatollah: Iran's military will 'punch' West
  5. Blacks face Senate shutout in 2011

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Question of the day

Supporters say Sarah Palin scored in her Tea Party appearance, while critics are having a field day with Mrs. Palin's 'hand-o-prompter' (the notes she scribbled on her palm). Who's right?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    White House communications chief to treat Fox differently than ABC, NBC

  • Belief Blog

    Anglican day of reckoning coming

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    (Almost) All about Apple's iPad

  • Redskins 360

    This is goodbye ... for now

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.