The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
    • World
    • National
    • Politics
    • National Security
    • DC Area
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Technology
    • Investigations
    • Faith
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Headlines
    • Citizen Journalism
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Commentary

    Al Qaeda's prospects

  • Sports

    Slow start dooms Capitals

  • National

    Winfrey: Prayer influenced 2011 exit

  • Politics

    Report: ACORN mismanaged grant money

  • Politics

    Obama's approval rating falls below 50%

  • Local

    Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal

  • Business

    Panel slams China's trade policies

Home » Opinion » Editorials

Thursday, June 11, 2009

EDITORIAL: Sotomayor's club for women only

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

The Democrats' double standard on gender

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos
Please stand by, images loading!
  • Sotomayor

More Editorials Stories

  • EDITORIAL EXCLUSIVE: On terrorists, Justice recused
  • EDITORIAL: Get ready to bomb Iran
  • EDITORIAL: An anti-pirate policy that works
  • EDITORIAL: Consumer destruction

By

It was revealed Friday that Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor belongs to the Belizean Grove, a highly selective club for women only. Senate Judiciary Chairman Sen. Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont announced Tuesday that her confirmation hearings will begin on July 13. If this judge were a man, the nomination would never make it to the Senate for hearings.

The Belizean Grove, founded in 1999, is modeled on the Bohemian Grove, a secretive, elite club for men only. The 125 members of the Belizean Grove include Army generals, Wall Street executives and former ambassadors. Ms. Sotomayor joined after becoming a circuit court judge.

We don't care if nominees belong to all-male or all-female clubs, but a double standard is in play. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr.'s supposed membership in an all-male eating club while an undergraduate at Princeton became an issue during his 2006 Supreme Court confirmation hearing. When Judge D. Brooks Smith was nominated to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in 2001, his confirmation was held up for almost a year in part because he belonged to an all-male fishing and gun club.

The opposition to all-male clubs isn't anything new. The American Bar Association's Canons of Judicial Ethics stipulates that judges "shall not" be members of any organization that unfairly discriminates based on gender.

In June 1990, Arlen Specter, then a Republican from Pennsylvania, and all but one of the Democrats on the Senate Judiciary committee sponsored a resolution warning nominees that having belonged to such clubs could be enough to deny them confirmation. The resolution claimed that membership in such organizations "conflicts with the impartiality, and the appearance of impartiality" expected of judges and that it will be held against the nominee unless they "actively engaged" in efforts to get underrepresented groups into the organizations.

Sens. Leahy, Specter and Herb Kohl, Wisconsin Democrat, supported the resolution and are still on the Judiciary Committee. Joseph Biden, who was the committee chairman at the time, is now vice president. None of them has expressed any concern over news that Ms. Sotomayor belongs to an all-female club. Despite inquiries to all of the above, only Sen. Specter's office responded, noting that Ms. Sotomayor's "club memberships and affiliations are appropriate topics for inquiry."

Privately, Democrats on Capitol Hill tell us that the Belizean Grove is not objectionable like all-male clubs such as Judge Smith's fishing and hunting club, where "wining and dining was happening" and business networking advantaged men who belonged to the club. But the Belizean Grove is all about networking too. Business Week reported in 2001 that panels at club meetings included topics such as "how to obtain money and power." The article noted that the expectation was that women in this group would "help one another in any way they can."

More than a few men would appreciate the help that the high-powered corporate chief executives and other leaders in the Belizean Grove could offer, but they're not allowed in Ms. Sotomayor's club. This association compounds concern about her gender bias, which has been exposed in her numerous statements about women's judgment being superior to men's, especially that of a "wise Latina woman" over a white man. There's no guarantee that a judge with these opinions will treat everyone equally from the bench.

We hoped that President Obama's election would bring an end to identity politics. Picking Judge Sotomayor for the Supreme Court has re-emphasized race and gender as central issues in politics today.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Health bill could get 34-hour reading in Senate
  2. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  3. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  4. Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
  5. PRUDEN: Obama bows, the nation cringes
More Top Stories »
  1. 19 gang members face racketeering charges
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Taliban chief hides in Pakistan
  3. Md.'s $1 billion in budget cuts not enough
  4. Palin met by hundreds in Michigan
  5. Lutherans second church to split over gays

Most Shared

  1. Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
  2. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  3. Tribe battles to keep logo for Fighting Sioux
  4. PRUDEN: Obama bows, the nation cringes
  5. PRUDEN: The Third World and Obama
More Top Stories »
  1. EXCLUSIVE: Taliban chief hides in Pakistan
  2. Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal
  3. EDITORIAL: Chicago, Afghan-style
  4. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  5. Army lacks guidelines to deal with jihadists in ranks

Most Commented

  1. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  2. Health bill could get 34-hour reading in Senate
  3. PRUDEN: The Third World and Obama
  4. Army lacks guidelines to deal with jihadists in ranks
  5. Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Get ready to bomb Iran
  2. Palin met by hundreds in Michigan
  3. Dems up pressure on health bill's holdouts
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Taliban chief hides in Pakistan
  5. Unforeseen climate 'crisis'

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Rookie Williams hurts ankle

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.