The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
    • World
    • National
    • Politics
    • National Security
    • DC Area
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Technology
    • Investigations
    • Faith
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Headlines
    • Citizen Journalism
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Editorials
  • Commentary
  • Columns
  • Water Cooler
  • Letters
  • Cartoons
  • Books
  • World

    Obama ratchets up threat of Iranian-nuke sanctions

  • National

    Mid-Atlantic braces for another wallop of snow

  • Business

    European economies facing grim times

  • Politics

    Obama rejects starting over on health care

  • Politics

    Illegal immigration fell sharply in '08

  • Health

    Obama fights obesity with executive power

  • Investigation

    Stimulus foes see value in seeking cash

Home » Opinion » Commentary

Monday, November 2, 2009

Beware the health insurance police

Rate this story

Average 5.00
after 3 votes
Login or register to rate this story

Is it constitutional to force Americans to buy coverage?

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More Commentary Stories

  • FORTENBERRY: Protesters are key to halting nuclear designs
  • BERES: Concluding the sanctions comedy
  • BINLEY: New revolution needs support of sanctions
  • RAHN: Where is the inflation?

By Donald Lambro

A constitutional debate among legal scholars is being waged over a key provision in the Democrats' health care legislation that poses this question about the freedom to be an American: Can the federal government force people to purchase medical insurance or pay a tax if they refuse?

Members of Congress, believing they are a power unto themselves far beyond the constraints of the Constitution, have a history of passing laws infringing upon our freedoms ever since the Alien and Sedition Acts.

The McCain-Feingold campaign finance law trampled our First Amendment right to express ourselves in the political marketplace during an election through our contributions or campaign ads - an abuse of power the courts partly curbed and may eventually deconstruct altogether.

Congress has never before required Americans to buy a product or service under penalty of law. Yet that's precisely what the health care bills pending in the House and Senate would do in the age of Obama, despite compelling arguments that the Constitution gives lawmakers no power to do so.

When President Clinton and first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton proposed health care legislation that made the very same demands, the Congressional Budget Office felt compelled to make this self-evident observation outside its purview as Congress' auditing clerk:

"A mandate requiring all individuals to purchase health insurance would be an unprecedented form of federal action. The government has never required people to buy any good or service as a condition of lawful residence in the United States," CBO wrote in August 1994.

"An individual mandate would have two features that, in combination, would make it unique. First it would impose a duty on individuals as members of society. Second, it would require people to purchase a specific service that would be heavily regulated by the federal government."

Any citizen who dared to refuse Congress' imperious edict would be slapped with a severe fine starting at $200 in 2014 and rising to $750 in 2017. The specter of an all-powerful government enforcing such a law led some concerned Republican lawmakers to point out that willful refusal to pay the so-called "excise tax" penalty to the IRS could lead to further fines and/or imprisonment.

Columbia University health policy professor Sherry Glied, named by President Obama to a top management post in the Department of Health and Human Services, warned that the process of "developing a system to promptly identify and penalize scofflaws ... may require a degree of intrusiveness and bureaucracy that some will find unpalatable."

In other words, lock your doors and pull down your shades because the health insurance police are coming.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

12Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Stimulus foes see value in seeking cash
  2. Va. Senate OKs ban on sexual orientation bias
  3. Another storm approaches Mid-Atlantic
  4. LYNCH: Drug czar should go
  5. Obama's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent
More Top Stories »
  1. Ayatollah: Iran's military will 'punch' West
  2. Storm could put Super Bowl fans in dark
  3. Clinton: Islamist terror is No. 1 threat
  4. Super snow Sunday: Region digs out from 'historic' storm
  5. Prop. 8 trial stirs questions, emotions

Most Shared

  1. Stimulus foes see value in seeking cash
  2. BLANKLEY: Palin delivers sparkle, warmth
  3. Army warned about jihadist threat in '08
  4. New federal office for global warming
  5. STEYN: The 'corpseman' cometh
More Top Stories »
  1. Obama's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent
  2. Ayatollah: Iran's military will 'punch' West
  3. PRUDEN: Hatching the Silly Bowl
  4. EDITORIAL: Free the Baptist 10 in Haiti
  5. Another storm approaches Mid-Atlantic

Most Commented

  1. Obama's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent
  2. Palin: President run may be 'right thing'
  3. Clinton: Islamist terror is No. 1 threat
  4. New federal office for global warming
  5. Rep. Murtha dies at age 77
More Top Stories »
  1. BLANKLEY: Palin delivers sparkle, warmth
  2. Obama to host televised, bipartisan meeting on health care
  3. Prop. 8 trial stirs questions, emotions
  4. Blacks face Senate shutout in 2011
  5. EDITORIAL: Free the Baptist 10 in Haiti

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Question of the day

What was your favorite Super Bowl ad?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    White House communications chief to treat Fox differently than ABC, NBC

  • Belief Blog

    Anglican day of reckoning coming

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    (Almost) All about Apple's iPad

  • Redskins 360

    This is goodbye ... for now

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.