The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • World
  • National
  • Politics
  • National Security
  • DC Area
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • Investigations
  • Faith
  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Headlines
  • Citizen Journalism
  • Politics

    Sanford faces 37 charges on state ethics laws

  • Politics

    Lobbyists spending big to shape health care debate

  • National

    Green energy stimulus growing few jobs

  • National

    9/11 defendants eye platform

  • Entertainment

    Jackson wins 4 American Music Awards

  • Politics

    Unemployment taxes hit small firms hard

  • Sports

    Redskins' loss like a kick in the gut

Home » News » National

Sunday, November 8, 2009

MARSHALL/DERHAM: Making our tax system more fair

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos
Please stand by, images loading!

More National Stories

  • Green energy stimulus growing few jobs
  • Study: Many day cares showing TV to tots
  • Orbiting astronaut welcomes new baby
  • Marine census reveals deep sea

By Will Marshall and Mike Derham

Americans want a tax system that is fair, simple and capable of raising the revenue we need to pay the nation's bills. The one we have fails on all three counts.

That's why President Obama will probably have to add comprehensive tax reform to his already jammed agenda.

The first imperative of reform is to restore progressivity, the keystone of a fairer tax system. Since there is a lot of fatuous talk about "socialism" in the air these days, it's worth noting that progressive taxation, which dates back to 1913, is a deeply American tradition.

It recognizes that our free enterprise system couldn't function properly without public laws, rules and investments in common goods like schools, roads, police and defense. Those citizens who reap the greatest rewards from our modern, mixed economy therefore have an obligation to give back, as Thomas Jefferson put it, in proportion to the bounty they have received.

At the same time, a progressive tax code lightens the tax burden on families of modest means, while creating incentives for them to advance by getting a good education, starting small businesses and saving for retirement.

In 2007, income and wealth inequality in America reached an all-time high (as measured by the Gini coefficient). Since a progressive rate structure offsets income inequality after taxes, President Bush's lowering of the top rates had the perverse effect of compounding today's growing disparities of wealth and power.

That's why we like a creative proposal by economists Robert Shiller and Len Burman called the "Rising Tide Tax System." Under this approach, the federal tax code would change according to economic circumstances. It would grow more progressive when, as now, the income of the richest is growing fastest and inequality is rising. Conversely, when inequality is dropping — as we saw in the 1950s and '60s — the tax structure would flatten out. Supply-siders should like that. Any takers?

TWT RELATED STORY:
• ELLIS: Making our tax system more fair

In addition, here are four steps toward a fairer, simpler and more fiscally responsible federal tax system:

First, allow Bush's indefensible tax cut for the wealthiest families to expire in January 2011. That will return us to the same top marginal rate (39.5 percent) that was in place during the economic boom of the 1990s. It would also raise $53 billion in annual revenue, while keeping in place tax relief for low-income and middle-class families.

Second, eliminate tax giveaways to speculators. As the billionaire Warren Buffett famously pointed out two years ago, Wall Street titans pay less in taxes than their secretaries. The Bush administration's 2003 decision to lower the capital gains rate to 15 percent, along with the "carried interest" breaks for investment funds no doubt contributed to the frenzy that fueled the Wall Street bubble. Reverting to a 20 percent long-term capital-gains rate for the highest earners, and taxing carried interest as ordinary income, will generate $15 billion a year and curb speculation.

Third, root out corporate welfare. The U.S. tax code is honeycombed with unwarranted subsidies for businesses. While many of these began as efforts to protect nascent industries or provide incentives for sectors that benefit the country as a whole, special interests have in many cases kept these exemptions in the code long past their useful life. The Progressive Policy Institute has long called for charging an independent panel, modeled on the successful military-base-closing commission, with developing a subsidy hit list and submitting it to Congress for an up-or-down vote. Not only would this save money, but by broadening the base of business taxation it would also allow us to reduce the U.S. corporate tax rate to globally competitive levels.

Fourth, it's past time to introduce a new principle into the tax-reform debate: Tax waste, not work. The federal gas tax is kept artificially low; it doesn't come close to covering what economists say are the actual costs, including the environmental ones, of burning oil. Meanwhile, the payroll tax workers and employers pay to finance Social Security and Medicare has grown to the point that it takes a bigger bite out of the paychecks of working families than the federal income tax.

This makes absolutely no sense. Raising taxes on fossil fuels will reduce greenhouse-gas emissions and drive private investment toward clean fuels. And by using the revenue generated by taxing waste to reduce the tax on work, we could give U.S. businesses a stronger incentive to hire new workers.

These reforms don't exhaust the list of what needs to be done to haul America's antiquated tax code into the 21st century. But they go a long way toward making federal taxes fair to middle-class families again.

• Will Marshall is the president of the Progressive Policy Institute. Mike Derham is the chairman of the PPI's Innovation Economy Project.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Massive bill steals show in health care debate
  2. Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal
  3. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
  4. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  5. EDITORIAL EXCLUSIVE: On terrorists, Justice recused
More Top Stories »
  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Hoffman considering recount claim
  3. Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
  4. EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin
  5. Report: ACORN mismanaged grant money

Most Shared

  1. Ego of 'O': It's all about him
  2. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  3. EDITORIAL EXCLUSIVE: On terrorists, Justice recused
  4. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
  5. Green energy stimulus growing few jobs
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Schumer's change of heart
  2. Unemployment taxes hit small firms hard
  3. EDITORIAL: Death for being a Christian
  4. VMI faces probe into sexism
  5. Bringing back the Howard

Most Commented

  1. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  2. ANALYSIS: Obama takes a bow, but applause is weak
  3. Senate Democrats win key vote on health bill
  4. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  5. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin
  2. Massive bill steals show in health care debate
  3. Lobbyists spending big to shape health care debate
  4. Green energy stimulus growing few jobs
  5. Military academies lack minority nominees

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

Do you think the public option will survive when the full Senate votes on the health reform bill?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    The weekly Redskins injury roundup

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.