The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • World
  • National
  • Politics
  • National Security
  • DC Area
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • Investigations
  • Faith
  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Headlines
  • Citizen Journalism
  • Business

    Toyota's bumpy ride began with race for growth

  • Security

    Chinese see U.S. debt as weapon in Taiwan dispute

  • World

    Obama ratchets up Iran sanctions threat

  • National

    Mid-Atlantic braces for new wallop of snow

  • Business

    European economies facing grim times

  • Politics

    Obama rejects starting over on health care

  • Politics

    Illegal immigration fell sharply in '08

Home » News » Politics

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Senate OKs Gitmo transfers to U.S.

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

Spending bill now goes to White House

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
Please stand by, images loading!
  • associated press
  • associated press
Sens. Saxby Chambliss (left) of Georgia and Jeff Sessions of Alabama (right) were among the 18 Republicans who voted against the homeland security spending bill. Senate Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin (center) of Illinois joined his fellow Democrats in voting "yes."
  • Allison Shelley/The Washington Times

More Politics Stories

  • Dems seek quick fix on campaign finance
  • Jobs bill cuts payroll tax on new hires
  • Illegal immigration fell sharply in '08
  • Stimulus foes see value in seeking cash

By Stephen Dinan

After dropping some popular immigration-enforcement measures, Congress on Tuesday passed the 2010 homeland security spending bill that gives President Obama the authority to transfer terrorism-suspect detainees to the United States for trial, though only after he submits a plan to Congress.

The Senate voted 79-19 to pass the $44.1 billion bill, following the House's approval last week. Mr. Obama is expected to sign it.

"It has been eight years, eight long years since the attacks of 9/11. There are some people in this country who have become complacent about the threat of another attack. Don't count me as one of them," said Sen. Robert C. Byrd, West Virginia Democrat and the lead Senate author of the bill.

The spending bill funds more than 20,000 U.S. Border Patrol agents, pays for more border security technology and extends the E-Verify program, which allows businesses to check a government database to make sure their new workers are legal. But it doesn't require further construction of the U.S.-Mexico border fence.

All but one of the 19 senators who voted against the bill were Republicans. Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana was the sole Democrat. They argued it would give Mr. Obama too much leeway to bring terrorism suspects from the detention facility at the U.S. Naval Base Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States for trial.

"We have a perfectly good and secure courtroom at Guantanamo Bay to try these individuals," said Sen. Saxby Chambliss, Georgia Republican.

Those Republicans said there is no good process for putting terrorists on trial in the United States. But Democrats said there are many precedents.

"History says otherwise. Over 350 convicted terrorists have been tried in our courts and are being held in our prisons today," said Senate Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin, Illinois Democrat. "Is America less safe because of it? No, we are safer."

Senators on both sides pointed to the hurdles Mr. Obama would have to go through to bring terrorism suspects to the United States, including that they must be brought only if the administration is ready to prosecute them.

Another fight is still pending on another spending bill over an amendment that would prevent those suspected of being directly involved in planning the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks from being brought to the United States for trial.

The homeland security spending bill also delivers a setback to civil libertarians seeking to force the release of new detainee- abuse photos. The bill allows the defense secretary to prevent the release of the photos if he deems their release harmful to national security.

The bill funds border security and extends the E-Verify program for three years. But Democrats, in hammering out the final bill, dropped Senate-passed measures that would have put E-Verify on permanent footing and allowed businesses to check not only new employees, but their existing work force as well.

"This is the third time this Congress and the leadership in this Congress have either removed, changed or blocked attempts to make this successful program permanent," said Sen. Jeff Sessions, Alabama Republican.

The bill also doesn't include a mandate to continue building the fence along the U.S.-Mexico border. Environmentalists groups cheered the omission, saying it could mark a change in border-security strategy.

Still, senators said the past few years have seen major advances in immigration enforcement, including the resources to allow the Border Patrol to have effective control over 729 miles of the nearly 2,000-mile-long border. In 2005, the Border Patrol claimed control over just 253 miles.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Stimulus foes see value in seeking cash
  2. Va. Senate OKs ban on sexual orientation bias
  3. Another storm approaches Mid-Atlantic
  4. Obama's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent
  5. Ayatollah: Iran's military will 'punch' West
More Top Stories »
  1. LYNCH: Drug czar should go
  2. Clinton: Islamist terror is No. 1 threat
  3. Md. may fine for piercing minors without parental OK
  4. Army warned about jihadist threat in '08
  5. Inside the Beltway

Most Shared

  1. Stimulus foes see value in seeking cash
  2. BLANKLEY: Palin delivers sparkle, warmth
  3. Army warned about jihadist threat in '08
  4. New federal office for global warming
  5. STEYN: The 'corpseman' cometh
More Top Stories »
  1. Ayatollah: Iran's military will 'punch' West
  2. Drive down debt, or we will be driven down
  3. PRUDEN: Hatching the Silly Bowl
  4. Obama's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent
  5. EDITORIAL: Free the Baptist 10 in Haiti

Most Commented

  1. Obama's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent
  2. Palin: President run may be 'right thing'
  3. New federal office for global warming
  4. Clinton: Islamist terror is No. 1 threat
  5. BLANKLEY: Palin delivers sparkle, warmth
More Top Stories »
  1. Rep. Murtha dies at age 77
  2. Prop. 8 trial stirs questions, emotions
  3. EDITORIAL: Free the Baptist 10 in Haiti
  4. Ayatollah: Iran's military will 'punch' West
  5. Blacks face Senate shutout in 2011

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Question of the day

Supporters say Sarah Palin scored in her Tea Party appearance, while critics are having a field day with Mrs. Palin's 'hand-o-prompter' (the notes she scribbled on her palm). Who's right?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    White House communications chief to treat Fox differently than ABC, NBC

  • Belief Blog

    Anglican day of reckoning coming

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    (Almost) All about Apple's iPad

  • Redskins 360

    This is goodbye ... for now

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.