The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • World
  • National
  • Politics
  • National Security
  • DC Area
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • Investigations
  • Faith
  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Headlines
  • Citizen Journalism
  • Politics

    Massive bill steals show in health care debate

  • Commentary

    Al Qaeda's prospects

  • Sports

    Slow start dooms Capitals

  • National

    Winfrey: Prayer influenced 2011 exit

  • Politics

    Report: ACORN mismanaged grant money

  • Politics

    Obama's approval rating falls below 50%

  • Local

    Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal

Home » News » World

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Anti-secrecy groups unhappy with Obama

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

Report compares use of executive privilege to Bush's

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos
Please stand by, images loading!
  • Agence France-Presse/Getty Images
President Obama is hewing close to his predecessor on the issue of state secrets, in the view of civil liberties advocates who hoped his administration would be more open.

More World Stories

  • World scene
  • Anglican archbishop visits pope, assured overture was no 'raid'
  • Insurance cut over Facebook bikini pictures
  • Iran: Missiles ready for Israel, U.S. bases if attacked

By Eli Lake

Advocates for more open government who had hoped that the Obama administration would be less secretive than its predecessor say it is continuing to use executive privilege to block lawsuits over allegations of past abuses in the fight against terrorism.

A new report from OpenTheGovernment.org, a coalition of anti-secrecy groups, criticized the Obama administration's interpretation of the so-called "state secrets privilege." Under it, the Justice Department has argued that courts must dismiss national security cases challenging wiretapping and the transport of suspected terrorists to CIA and foreign jails, where they claim they were tortured.

The flap over the issue appears to be another example of Mr. Obama charting a relatively centrist path on issues regarding terrorism. Past CIA directors and some Republicans have criticized the president for disclosing information regarding harsh interrogation procedures and for allowing the Justice Department to reopen cases against CIA interrogators.

However, civil liberties groups argue that the Obama administration's interpretation of the state secrets privilege so far is the same as the George W. Bush administration's.

"This administration is continuing to use the enlarged executive powers of the Bush-Cheney administration," said Patrice McDermott, director of OpenTheGovernment.org, who oversaw the report.

The group's steering committee includes many longtime advocates for more openness in government, including the Federation of American Scientists, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

According to the report, President Obama "deeply disappointed advocates who had hoped he would act quickly to rein in the abuse of the privilege to shut down litigation."

The report notes that in a recent case the Justice Department filed a friend of the court brief saying there was a basis in the Constitution for the state secrets privilege and that the Supreme Court had recognized this for the first time in 1953.

As both a candidate and as president, Mr. Obama opposed a broad interpretation of the privilege.

He told an April 29 news conference, "I actually think that the state secret doctrine should be modified. I think right now it's over-broad. But keep in mind, what happens is, we come into office; we're in for a week, and suddenly we've got a court filing that's coming up. And so we don't have the time to effectively think through what exactly should [an] overarching reform of that doctrine take. We've got to respond to the immediate case in front of us."

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

12Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Health bill could get 34-hour reading in Senate
  2. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  3. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  4. Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
  5. PRUDEN: Obama bows, the nation cringes
More Top Stories »
  1. 19 gang members face racketeering charges
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Taliban chief hides in Pakistan
  3. Massive bill steals show in health care debate
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Hoffman considering recount claim
  5. Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal

Most Shared

  1. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  2. Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal
  3. PRUDEN: Obama bows, the nation cringes
  4. Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
  5. Faint Shroud of Turin text proves artifact real, book says
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Chicago, Afghan-style
  2. EDITORIAL EXCLUSIVE: On terrorists, Justice recused
  3. Socialist or vast expansion?
  4. Massive bill steals show in health care debate
  5. EXCLUSIVE: Taliban chief hides in Pakistan

Most Commented

  1. PRUDEN: The Third World and Obama
  2. Army lacks guidelines to deal with jihadists in ranks
  3. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  4. Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
  5. EDITORIAL: Get ready to bomb Iran
More Top Stories »
  1. Dems up pressure on health bill's holdouts
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Taliban chief hides in Pakistan
  3. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  4. Unforeseen climate 'crisis'
  5. Obama's approval rating falls below 50%

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

Do you think Pakistan has done enough to help us find the terrorists who want to hurt the U.S.?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Rookie Williams hurts ankle

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.