The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
    • World
    • National
    • Politics
    • National Security
    • DC Area
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Technology
    • Investigations
    • Faith
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Headlines
    • Citizen Journalism
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Home & Living
  • Family & Kids
  • Fashion
  • Food
  • Travel
  • Health
  • Washington Visitors
  • Books
  • Military History
  • Life
  • Auto
  • TV Listings
  • Movie Listings
  • Death Notices
  • Entertainment
  • Business

    Toyota's bumpy ride began with race for growth

  • Security

    Chinese see U.S. debt as weapon in Taiwan dispute

  • World

    Obama ratchets up Iran sanctions threat

  • National

    Mid-Atlantic braces for new wallop of snow

  • Business

    European economies facing grim times

  • Politics

    Obama rejects starting over on health care

  • Politics

    Illegal immigration fell sharply in '08

Home » Culture » Family & Kids

Sunday, September 13, 2009

HOME-SCHOOLING: Interfering judge makes bad ruling

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
Please stand by, images loading!
  • Kate Tsubata

More Family & Kids Stories

  • 'Choose Life' license plate trend gaining
  • Prop. 8 trial stirs questions, emotions
  • Zadzooks: Soul Kiss, X-Men Forever and Star Wars: The Clone Wars, Colossus of Destiny reviews
  • With 1-child policy, China 'missing' girls

By Kate Tsubata

Home-schooling is a human right. Parents have the right to teach their children according to their beliefs and customs — and this has been true from time immemorial. It is unacceptable for courts and government agencies — of whatever country — to interfere in the responsibility of the parent to raise his or her own child.

Reading about the recent decree by a New Hampshire judge that 10-year-old Amanda Kurowski be required to attend public school to be exposed to beliefs other than that of her mother, a strong Christian, made me wonder where the ACLU has gone.

Doesn't the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights say, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"? Where does a district judge of a particular state get the authority to supersede the Constitution? Why should this girl be denied freedom of assembly and freedom of speech, not to mention freedom of religion?

Judge Lucinda V. Sadler does not have the right to decide what is proper religious exposure for a child. To say, in a court ruling that the girl's "vigorous defense of her religious beliefs … suggests strongly that she has not had the opportunity to consider any other point of view," is overstepping the role of adjudication. A judge is not entrusted with the job of deciding whose religious faith has been tested or untested by exposure to others — especially when that person is 10 years old. Rather, the judge's job is to protect the natural and constitutional rights of that minor from interference by those who would seek to separate her from her parent's guardianship, and from the moral teachings that parent seeks to equip her with.

The origin of the complaints is the divorced father's attempts, using the court system, to keep the mother from home-schooling her daughter. Though he failed to force this in a 2006 action, the court appointed a legal advocate, ostensibly to safeguard the girl's interests. The advocate reportedly refused to accept the mother's submissions on the home-schooling materials used. The judge ignored New Hampshire state law, which requires evidence of harm to a child before removing her from the home-school situation, and interposed an arbitrary basis for removal — that the child "appeared to reflect the mother's rigidity on questions of faith," and "would be best served by exposure to different points of view at a time in her life when she must begin to critically evaluate multiple systems of belief and behavior."

Multiple systems of belief and behavior? I must say that having studied the basic teachings of the major world religions, I can't say that what a strong Christian believes would be any different on the matters of morality than what a Muslim, Jew, Hindu or Buddhist believes.

I am tired of seeing jurists, legislators and social service agencies ignore the really desperate circumstances when children do need protection — such as the 300,000 runaways enslaved and prostituted all over America — and instead target a good mother educating a loyal and religiously observant daughter.

What's next? Using Muslim girls' modest head cover to force them into secular classrooms? Forbidding Jewish boys from wearing a yarmulke? Telling Christians that to wear a cross is a hate crime?

It's time for such hypocritical and invasive misuses of power to be confronted. Our nation wouldn't exist — and certainly would not allow the diversity this judge finds so important — if it wasn't for the many Christians who sacrificed everything to establish a nation where all people could worship God according to their own conscience. Diversity is protected by faith, not destroyed by it.

It is instructive to note that state usurpation of parental education was a cornerstone of three memorable 20th-century governments: Joseph Stalin's USSR, Adolf Hitler's Nazi Germany and Mao Zedong's Cultural Revolution in China. Let's hope sensible judicial minds will reverse this blatant violation of human rights, and uphold the rights of parents to teach children according to their own faith.

• Kate Tsubata is a freelance writer and home-schooler who lives in Maryland.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Stimulus foes see value in seeking cash
  2. Va. Senate OKs ban on sexual orientation bias
  3. Another storm approaches Mid-Atlantic
  4. Obama's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent
  5. Ayatollah: Iran's military will 'punch' West
More Top Stories »
  1. LYNCH: Drug czar should go
  2. Clinton: Islamist terror is No. 1 threat
  3. Md. may fine for piercing minors without parental OK
  4. Army warned about jihadist threat in '08
  5. Inside the Beltway

Most Shared

  1. Stimulus foes see value in seeking cash
  2. BLANKLEY: Palin delivers sparkle, warmth
  3. Army warned about jihadist threat in '08
  4. Drive down debt, or we will be driven down
  5. STEYN: The 'corpseman' cometh
More Top Stories »
  1. PRUDEN: Hatching the Silly Bowl
  2. EDITORIAL: Fudging jobless statistics
  3. Ayatollah: Iran's military will 'punch' West
  4. Chinese see U.S. debt as weapon in Taiwan dispute
  5. Labor nominee blocked in Senate

Most Commented

  1. Obama's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent
  2. Palin: President run may be 'right thing'
  3. New federal office for global warming
  4. Rep. Murtha dies at age 77
  5. BLANKLEY: Palin delivers sparkle, warmth
More Top Stories »
  1. Clinton: Islamist terror is No. 1 threat
  2. Obama rejects starting over on health care
  3. Prop. 8 trial stirs questions, emotions
  4. Ayatollah: Iran's military will 'punch' West
  5. EDITORIAL: Free the Baptist 10 in Haiti

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Question of the day

Supporters say Sarah Palin scored in her Tea Party appearance, while critics are having a field day with Mrs. Palin's "hand-o-prompter" (the notes she scribbled on her palm). Who is right?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    White House communications chief to treat Fox differently than ABC, NBC

  • Belief Blog

    Anglican day of reckoning coming

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    (Almost) All about Apple's iPad

  • Redskins 360

    This is goodbye ... for now

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.