The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
    • World
    • National
    • Politics
    • National Security
    • DC Area
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Technology
    • Investigations
    • Faith
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Headlines
    • Citizen Journalism
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Editorials
  • Commentary
  • Columns
  • Water Cooler
  • Letters
  • Cartoons
  • Books
  • Health

    Obama fights obesity with executive power

  • Investigation

    Stimulus foes see value in seeking cash

  • Politics

    President's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent

  • Security

    Ayatollah: Iran's military will 'punch' West

  • Politics

    Rep. Murtha dies at age 77

  • Security

    Army warned about jihadist threat in '08

  • Politics

    New federal office for global warming

Home » Opinion » Commentary

Monday, September 21, 2009

Is abortion health care, or is it not?

Rate this story

Average 5.00
after 3 votes
Login or register to rate this story

This existential question is precisely the debate we confront

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More Commentary Stories

  • BOOK REVIEW: Costs of presidential dissembling
  • WARREN: Trust not in trust funds
  • CONKO&HILFERTY: Killing health care competition with antitrust
  • BLANKLEY: Palin delivers sparkle, warmth

By Charmaine Yoest

The health care debate, the greatest challenge of the Obama presidency, has abortion at its epicenter, and no one realizes this more than the White House. In recent weeks, President Obama, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid have all insisted that the health care proposals under consideration would not cover abortion.

Nevertheless, that's not the reality we face on the Hill. Recently, we had a meeting with senior White House officials to focus on our serious opposition to the abortion mandate in health care reform. They reiterated the president's statement from his address before Congress and were noncommittal about specific language that would address the current concerns of pro-life advocates.

The truth is that the health care packages under consideration do include abortion funding. Without a specific statutory amendment that includes an explicit ban on federal funding and coverage, we face health care reform that includes abortion.

Lost in the debate over whether or not abortion is "in there" - whether or not you can flip to a certain page and point to a particular clause related to abortion funding - is an understanding among political elites that this is a watershed battle over definition. It's existential, if you will, and comes down to a very straightforward question: Is abortion health care, or is it not?

An inadvertent answer from the abortion advocates' side emerged during the debate over H.R. 3200 in the House Education and Labor Committee on July 22 after Rep. Mark Souder, Indiana Republican, offered an amendment to exclude abortion funding from health care reform. Rep. Lynn Woolsey, California Democrat, clearly miffed, responded:

"[Abortion] is a legal medical practice and by even having to talk about it ... we're not talking about having your tonsils out. ..."

No, indeed we are not. As a matter of public policy, we still have the ability to differentiate between an abortion and a tonsillectomy. But this is precisely the debate we confront.

Planned Parenthood and the abortion lobby define abortion as health care, as being morally equivalent to a tonsillectomy, and health care reform is their vehicle for imposing that view definitively with the full force of the federal government.

For the record, the Souder amendment to bar federal funding of abortion failed, as have all similar attempts to provide a clear and unequivocal abortion exclusion.

This is literally a defining moment for the pro-life movement. On Planned Parenthood's Web site, the very first category under Health on the navigation bar is Abortion.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

12Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Va. Senate OKs ban on sexual orientation bias
  2. LYNCH: Drug czar should go
  3. Storm could put Super Bowl fans in dark
  4. Ayatollah: Iran's military will 'punch' West
  5. Clinton: Islamist terror is No. 1 threat
More Top Stories »
  1. Oh snow! Another storm approaches
  2. President's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent
  3. Super snow Sunday: Region digs out from 'historic' storm
  4. Obama rallies glum Dems amid GOP woes
  5. Prop. 8 trial stirs questions, emotions

Most Shared

  1. Army warned about jihadist threat in '08
  2. BLANKLEY: Palin delivers sparkle, warmth
  3. New federal office for global warming
  4. STEYN: The 'corpseman' cometh
  5. Ayatollah: Iran's military will 'punch' West
More Top Stories »
  1. President's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent
  2. Stimulus foes see value in seeking cash
  3. PRUDEN: Hatching the Silly Bowl
  4. EDITORIAL: Free the Baptist 10 in Haiti
  5. Va. Senate OKs ban on sexual orientation bias

Most Commented

  1. Palin: President run may be 'right thing'
  2. Clinton: Islamist terror is No. 1 threat
  3. New federal office for global warming
  4. President's bipartisan call hits wall of dissent
  5. Obama to host televised, bipartisan meeting on health care
More Top Stories »
  1. Aide: Stop criticizing anti-terror effort
  2. Obama rallies glum Dems amid GOP woes
  3. Prop. 8 trial stirs questions, emotions
  4. Rep. Murtha dies at age 77
  5. LYNCH: Drug czar should go

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Question of the day

What was your favorite Super Bowl ad?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    White House communications chief to treat Fox differently than ABC, NBC

  • Belief Blog

    Anglican day of reckoning coming

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    (Almost) All about Apple's iPad

  • Redskins 360

    This is goodbye ... for now

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.