The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out


  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
    • World
    • National
    • Politics
    • National Security
    • DC Area
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Technology
    • Investigations
    • Faith
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Headlines
    • Citizen Journalism
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • TWT BLOGS: Latest
  • Staff blogs
  • Create a blog

House health care bill contains menu requirements

By Amanda Carpenter on Oct. 29, 2009 into Hot Button Blog

  • Subscribe

Tucked inside Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi’s 1,990-page health care reform bill that was unveiled Thursday is a requirement for chain restaurants to post caloric information on their menus.

Pages 1511-1519 of the bill outline the new laws for restaurants, mandating any restaurants operating in 20 or more locations post caloric information “prominently” on menus in a way that's “designed to enable the public to understand, in the context of a total daily diet, the significance of the caloric information that is provided on the menu.”

That means all the big-name chains, like Starbucks, Dunkin Donuts and McDonald’s will need to post calorie counts next to their offerings, even on their drive-thru menus.

The government will also ensure that vending machines show calorie counts, as well. The bill says that anyone who operates 20 or more vending machines “shall provide a sign in close proximity to each article of food or the selection button that includes a clear and conspicuous statement disclosing the number of calories contained in the article.”

New York City already has a similar law on the books for their city's restauruants that was enacted in July 2008 in hopes of encouraging people to limit their caloric intake while eating out and in turn, lowering obesity rates.

But research published this month by Health Affairs and conducted by a group of professors at New York University and Yale says otherwise. It found that people in New York typically purchased 825 calories before the menu labeling law went into effect and 846 calories after it became law.

"Thus, simply displaying information about the caloric value of various food options may fail to translate into attitudinal, motivational, or - most importantly - behavioral changes in line with choosing healthier food options," the study said.

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Comment

There are 3 Comments

luciana_delacruz

For whatever reasons, the overweight, fat and obese who can not control their food intakes are not interested in counting calories. Those of us who choose to maintain healthy weights and prefer not to waddle around in plus sizes with our bellies hanging over our belts, appreciate having calories printed on menus as it enables us to quickly calculate an acceptable caloric intake. ************ My husband (a well-muscled 6'4"/205 lbs.) and I (5'10"/140 lbs.) eat almost any foods we desire, but always in moderation as we count calories. And yes, it also helps that we run (that's run, not jog) five miles each morning at an altitude of 6,200 feet (weather permitting) and do 45 minutes of strength exercises three days each week. The last time either of us (both in our sixties) was admitted to a hospital occurred five years ago when I was thrown from a horse and broke a leg. ************ A healthy lifestyle contributes immensely to the enjoyment of life.
Mark as offensive

ACRScout

The falacy of over-weight=unhealthy and low-weight=healthy is totally idiotic. Yes there are some people who are overweight and need to drop some weight, but the generalized condemnation of people merely because they do not fit an arbitrary standard is just plain dumb and prejudicial. I joined the Army at age 18 and serve 22 years in Combat Arms as a Cavalry Scout. I was in very good shape, having played on football and wrestling teams in High school. But as age and wear came, so did a slowing in abilities. I retired at age 40, with bad knees and back, and osteo arthritis due to the wear and tear of duty in the Army. I have seen many people in my life who are of lean body mass (<10%), going in for heart bypass surgery due to heredetary conditions, or men who fit the lean "recruiting poster" image, but who could not pass an APFT, so I do not buy into the lie that "thin" means "fit", or "healthy". During my career in the Army, I ate right and excerised more than the average soldier, but all that was for naught, because due to the arbitrary standard of the Army, even though I was well below the 24% authorized bodyfat limit, I was "overweight", ans subject to routine demands for bodyfat testing and criticism and threats of removal from service from seniors for not meeting the Ht/Wt scales even thought I met the standards for body mass. That beratement from others was one of the reasons I elected to retire at 40 after 22 years and not to resume military service to the allowed 30 years. At 44 I was diagnosed with Acute Myeloid Leukemia. I have never in my life engaged in "risky" behavior, smoking, drugs, etc. Yet I still got cancer. My Oncologyst says that the only known causes of this type of cancer are exposure to benzine and/or radiation. The only sources of either of these had come from my military service. Yet the government says that since I didn't have the cancer when I retired, they are not responsible. At age 52, I am still retired. I do not run every day, military activities destroyed both of my knees and back to a point where even walking is painful. But at one time in my life I was able to do 80 push-ups in 2 minutes, 80 sit-ups in 2 minutes, and run 2 miles in 11.5 minutes, good enough to score a maximum number of points on the Army Physical Fitness Test. I was 5' 10", 190lbs and 11% body fat, yet with all that physical ability, by an arbitrary standard I was "overweight". I do not need to have calories printed on food to know what to eat nor do I need a government bureaucrat dictating behavior to tell me to shed a few pounds now and then. If Obamacare becomes law, I have already seen why Congress has exempted themselves and it is not because they have a legal mandated health care system for Congress, but rather if they were placed into the same system many invision for the masses, they could not survive do to so many Congress persons being among the severely overweight.
Mark as offensive

NomenNescio

Each of us can cite a personal experience or, anecdotaly, the experience of someone else, that is contrary to the "rule." But specific, individual experiences can not be generalized as valid for an entire population. *********** In this case, there is overwhelming clinical and statistical evidence from government agencies, universities, hospitals, the health insurance industry and the pharmaceutical industry that being overweight is unhealthy and being obese is extremely unhealthy. Not only in this country, but around the world. ************ Other than what she has posted on the WT, I know nothing about Ms./Mrs Delacruz, above. But I have an idea that her lifestyle is much healthier and far superior to those who are overweight, especially those who are obese. And I suspect that those who know they should moderate their food intake, but fail to do so, are suffering from some kind of personality disorder. Much like those who feel sorry for themselves and compensate by overeating.
Mark as offensive

Please login or register to post a comment

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.