The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out


  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
    • World
    • National
    • Politics
    • National Security
    • DC Area
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Technology
    • Investigations
    • Faith
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Headlines
    • Citizen Journalism
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • TWT BLOGS: Latest
  • Staff blogs
  • Create a blog

Nancy Pelosi and the Catholic bishops

By Julia Duin on Aug. 27, 2008 into Belief Blog

  • Subscribe

Here's the latest from the Archdiocese of San Francisco: Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, whose church history lecture on "Meet the Press" last Sunday has been condemned by six bishops, will not get a scolding — yet — from her own bishop. 

Instead, Archbishop George Niederauer of San Francisco wants to write "a larger, more thoughtful look on the issue," his press people tell me. The date it will go up on the archdiocesan Web site Sept. 5.

Mediawise, that's light years down the road. The Republican convention will be wrapping up at that point, and maybe everyone will have forgotten Mrs. Pelosi's thoughts on how St. Augustine did not consider abortion to be homicide. 

Why the San Francisco archbishop is going the leisurely route while six other bishops could not wait to paste their objections, Wittenburg-door style, up on their sites within two days of the House speaker's remarks is a mystery. Last I talked with her press people, Mrs. Pelosi was pretty defiant, insisting her read of fourth-century patristics was correct.

Earth to Nancy:

Do not mess with the bishops. Do not suggest your understanding of church doctrine trumps theirs, especially when your only academic claim to theological expertise is a B.A. from Trinity College. If anything gets a bishop going, it's someone trying to supplant his traditional role as teacher of the faith.

Sen. John Kerry would be happy to inform you of what happens when you defy church officials. Not only can they deep-six your political career by telling you not to receive Communion at their altars, they can do serious damage to one's presidential aspirations. Remember Ohio.

When I called around yesterday asking why six bishops in a space of 18 hours issued statements condemning you, starting with Monday's salvo from the Denver bishops, well, there were a number of factors. Said one person at the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, "The bishops were taking advantage of a teachable moment in the culture to correct the misrepresentation of church teaching on abortion." In other words, if it's already being splashed around cable TV, it's time to put those church Web sites to use. Starting Monday night, this popped up on the Archdiocese of Washington's site, followed by this on the USCCB's site and then this on the New York archdiocese's site. Only the pope gets a faster reaction than that. 

You are fortunate to have a bishop who moves kind of slowly on these issues. Everyone thought that the "wafer watch" of 2004 would not repeat itself. You and Sen. Joe Biden have helped resurrect that. Which is great for us religion reporters. But it might not be so helpful for you.

 

— Julia Duin, assistant national editor/religion, The Washington Times

 

 

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Comment

There are 4 Comments

fredm1

Ms. Duin- While Ms. Pelosi deserves every bit of the beating she takes in the press for her irresponsible "theological" commentary on non-negotiable Church teachings, I do have one gripe with your article. Please get rid of the "wafer watch" tag-line (or as it is also sometimes called, the "wafer wars.") The Holy Eucharist is the sum and summit of the catholic faith. As you are probably aware, catholics believe that the Eucharist is the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ. It is not a "wafer," and practicing catholics everywhere cringe when the press takes this liberty. Moreover, what these catholic bishops are trying to accomplish here both morally and theologically is serious business within the Church. In another time, this type of public pronouncement by someone claiming to be "catholic" was called heresy. Your shorthand description of the problem does a disservice to their efforts by making it seem less important than it really is. Thanks. Fred
Mark as offensive

Alligatorshoes

What Pelosi has done is to usurp the role of the leaders of her own church. To say that she has long studied this issue and come to a conclusion by pretending that the Church has not defined its stand on abortion shows an arrogance beyond belief. This is the modus operandi of the Democratic Party she leads: throw out falsehoods and watch gullible takers bite. When exposed deny, retract, do anything--but by then, most often, serious damage would have been done. I cringe.
Mark as offensive

nokatrina

Pelosi and Biden both are arrogant people who put themselves above God Himself. It is my hope that all politicians who support the murder of the innocents will actively be denied the Eucharist and not told just that they should stop taking it.
Mark as offensive

ncredwing

To MG: You never come out and state if you consider yourself a Catholic or are just another of the catholic bashers out there. At any rate you obviously do not understand Catholicism or for that matter the issue at hand. So by your premise, Nancy Pelosi can misrepresent the teachings of the Catholic Church and since the issue involved has political aspects the church has no right to clarify its teachings. Abortion is far more than a political issue, it is a moral issue and indeed a religious issue in that it is murder. No matter how you want to spin the issue it is taking the life of a human being and as such is murder. Even those who do not ascribe to a belief in God, acknowledge murder as wrong. And yes many Catholics do indeed support causes like the right to life. However many non-Catholics support these causes as well. In both cases it is not simply because the Church has told us to do so. It is because we recognize an evil in our world that needs to be addressed and removed. The Church is not trying to legislate religious constructs, it is clarifying the teachings of the Church which are in fact the teachings of Christ himself.
Mark as offensive

Please login or register to post a comment

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.