The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out


  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
    • World
    • National
    • Politics
    • National Security
    • DC Area
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Technology
    • Investigations
    • Faith
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Headlines
    • Citizen Journalism
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • TWT BLOGS: Latest
  • Staff blogs
  • Create a blog

Mormons and gay marriage

By Julia Duin on Jan. 7, 2009 into Belief Blog

  • Subscribe

   I get Sunstone, an irreverent Mormon publication that helps translate the world of the Latter-day Saints into language the rest of us can understand. In one recent issue, I chanced upon "Why Mormonism Can't Abide Gay Marriage." The reasons are theological.

   Author Christopher Bigelow, the great-great-great-grandson of a Mormon apostle who had more than 40 wives, writes that Mormons are created in the image of a God who has human body parts, including genitals. Mormon doctrine also states that God is married to a Mrs. God and that these heavenly parents engage in some form of celestial sex. 

   "In order for same-sex marriage to be accepted by Mormons, we would need to become convinced that God himself could conceivably engage in such a union, including its sexual implications," he wrote. "To put it more bluntly, unless God himself could be gay and still be God, then there's no room for homosexuality in Mormon doctrine." 

    I have been unsuccessful in locating this essay online, so I am providing parts of it. There is biblical precedent for polygamy, a Mormon practice that has long since been outlawed, he writes, but not same-sex intercourse. "As I see it, the bottom line is that we Mormons would have to give up our theological integrity to accommodate gay marriage," he adds. "If we thought that God could be gay, our eternally procreative marriage-based doctrine would collapse like a house of cards." 

   So, that's what's at stake for the Mormons and why they are fighting so hard to keep marriage legally between a man and a woman. 

   The Sunstone folks, by the way, are having a conference Jan. 30-31 at Marymount University in northern Virginia.

  - Julia Duin, religion editor

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Comment

There are 5 Comments

Roth

As with any religious doctrine, the Mormon doctrine is fluid. While Bigelow's comments are accurate, they give a partial and inadequate picture. While there is some underlying doctrinal basis, the Mormon's adoption of puritanical or evangelical ideas about sex came in part because of their early persecution for polygamy. The mainstream Mormon church is always trying to distance itself from its past. Leaders over the past fifty years have propounded sexual morality and gender roles in an attempt to conform to a perceived American religious ideal. How better to do that than out puritan the puritans?
Mark as offensive

northcoast

This all provides more to chew on than simply "a man shall leave his father and mother and be united with his wife."
Mark as offensive

capturedlive

Unlike Bigelow's, Roth's statement is extremely inaccurate. From the LDS Church's inception in the 1830's its doctrine of heterosexual roles have remained the same. It has nothing to do with pandering to other faiths; they probably share the same beliefs about sex because they embrace the same Bible. And while you may think this is just a case of "he-said/he-said," ask yourself this question: Why would a faith which espouses revolutionary doctrinal tenets that turned the evangelical world against it give a flying fig what they think about their beliefs regarding sexual roles?
Mark as offensive

hankhawk

The article states, "that Mormons are created in the image of a God who has human body parts, including genitals. Mormon doctrine also states that God is married to a Mrs. God and that these heavenly parents engage in some form of celestial sex." TOTALLY WRONG -- GOD IS SPIRIT NOT A CREATED BEING SUCH AS MANKIND -- READ YOUR BIBLE BEFORE MAKING SUCH ABSURD STATEMENTS ABOUT GOD. God gave mankind gifts and pleasures to enjoy -- first as a sinless man and woman, but even later enjoy when mankind repented and accepted Jesus. The goodness of God is seen in the variety of natural pleasures which He has provided for His creatures. God might have been pleased to satisfy our hunger without the food being pleasing to our palates—how His benevolence appears in the varied flavors which He has given to meats, vegetables, and fruits! God has not only given us senses, but also that which gratifies them; and this too reveals His goodness. The earth might have been as fertile as it is without its surface being so delightfully variegated. Our physical lives could have been sustained without beautiful flowers to regale our eyes, and exhale sweet perfumes. We might have walked the fields without our ears being saluted by the music of the birds. Whence, then, this loveliness, this charm, so freely diffused over the face of nature? Verily, "The tender mercies of the Lord are over all His works" (Ps. 145:9).
Mark as offensive

Roth

Capturedlive should probably brush up on her/his history of Mormonism before stating that I'm "extremely inaccurate". There is an extreme tension within the Mormon religion between its lust for mainstream acceptance and its fear of its past and radical doctrines. A long standing critique of the Mormon Church by the Sunstone crowd is the obfuscation of the past history and more radical doctrines, i.e. Adam/God theory (Doctrinal theory that God the Father and Adam are the same person). If I was inaccurate, it was because I may have been a little short in the time the Mormon Church has been pandering to mainstream American thought and religion. The quest for acceptance began with the 1890 Manifesto abolishing polygamy that led to Utah becoming a State. Ignoring the social and cultural aspects of the religion and claiming that the adamant opposition to Prop 8 stemmed solely from a doctrinal fear is a wee bit myopic and narrow.
Mark as offensive

Please login or register to post a comment

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.