The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out


  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
    • World
    • National
    • Politics
    • National Security
    • DC Area
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Technology
    • Investigations
    • Faith
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Headlines
    • Citizen Journalism
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • TWT BLOGS: Latest
  • Staff blogs
  • Create a blog

Obama makes Oval Office call to reporters

By Joe_Curl on March 8, 2009 into Joe Curl

  • Subscribe

President Obama was so concerned that he had appeared to dismiss a question from New York Times reporters about whether he was a socialist that he called the newspaper from the Oval Office to clarify his policies.

"It was hard for me to believe that you were entirely serious about that socialist question," he told reporters, who had interviewed the president aboard Air Force One on Friday.

Opening the unusual presidential call to reporters by saying that there was "just one thing I was thinking about as I was getting on the copter," he said it wasn't he who started the federal government's intervention into the nation's financial system.

"I did think it might be useful to point out that it wasn’t under me that we started buying a bunch of shares of banks. It wasn’t on my watch. And it wasn’t on my watch that we passed a massive new entitlement -– the prescription drug plan -- without a source of funding. And so I think it’s important just to note when you start hearing folks throw these words around that we’ve actually been operating in a way that has been entirely consistent with free-market principles and that some of the same folks who are throwing the word 'socialist' around can’t say the same."

TWT RELATED STORIES:
• Democrats try to brand earmarks as good

• GOP says some banks may have to fail

• Obama taps Big Easy for U.S. blueprint

The New York Times asked, "So whose watch are we talking about here?" but Obama wouldn't name names.

"Well, I just think it’s clear by the time we got here, there already had been an enormous infusion of taxpayer money into the financial system. And the thing I constantly try to emphasize to people if that coming in, the market was doing fine, nobody would be happier than me to stay out of it. I have more than enough to do without having to worry the financial system. The fact that we’ve had to take these extraordinary measures and intervene is not an indication of my ideological preference, but an indication of the degree to which lax regulation and extravagant risk taking has precipitated a crisis."

He concluded the brief call by saying, "I think that covers it."

The phone call came after the president was asked aboard his plane: "Are you a socialist as some people have suggested?"

He was clear in his first answer: "You know, let’s take a look at the budget – the answer would be no."

"Is there anything wrong with saying, 'Yes'?" a Times reporter pressed.

"Let’s just take a look at what we’ve done," Obama said, ticking off efforts his administration has made to stabilize the economy. But he acknowledged that, as he told Joe the Plumber, he plans to try to spread the wealth around.

"If you look on the revenue side what we’re proposing, what we’re looking at is essentially to go back to the tax rates that existed during the 1990s when, as I recall, rich people were doing very well. In fact everybody was doing very well. . . . We said that we’d give a tax cut to 95 percent of working Americans. That’s exactly what we have done."

-- Joseph Curl, senior political correspondent, The Washington Times

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Comment

There are 246 Comments

ziggy_stardust

Marxist
Mark as offensive

pardonme

Pardonme but this guy talks so much that he forgets what has already transpired. Was it not SEN. Obama that made a big deal out of voting for the original bailout back in October of 2008? It was he who was the party nominee and as the potential new president the dems voted with him. Now he wants us to think it was someone else who did this???
Mark as offensive

mr_peepers

Watch him guys.......he's spoofed the public before???? He sounds great...he looks great....he reads the teleprompter great....he bs's great.... Watch 'em closely.
Mark as offensive

jimmyjames

I'm not sure what more revealing: the duck of the question by Obama to the question posed by the NY Times reporter or the insinuation by that reporter that there's nothing wrong with Socialism?! No wonder Obama still has high polling numbers; Even when he basically admits he's a Socialist, the lib press runs cover for him. Amazing....
Mark as offensive

bobert432

so his answer amounts: "we were already Socialists when I got here!" which is an interesting way of admitting that he is indeed a Socialist. Here's a thought: now that he's in charge, maybe when could stop intervening in private markets & nationalizing banks? that might end this whole "Socialism" stigma. until he does that, he's a Socialist - and he seems to know it.
Mark as offensive

VinceP1974

Stalinist
Mark as offensive

floyd_dabarber

Obama says "I did think it might be useful to point out that it wasn’t under me that we started buying a bunch of shares of banks. It wasn’t on my watch." In other words: "Her clothes were off when I got there, your Honor. I didn't strip her. I just raped her."
Mark as offensive

hrb266

Bush is gone. Someone said "change" is coming so get rid of Plan D, etc. That's all.
Mark as offensive

lamecherry

Of course Birdie Obama was upset calling the New York Times thinking they were kidding in calling him a socialist. Any Marxist would be insulted at being called a socialist. Barack Obama is raiding the banks and handing out cash just like Robert Mugabe and Fidel Castro. Give him time and he will be like Daniel Ortega in owning the entire car franchise in America. Obama will probably be national leader of GE, Boeing and IBM. It is so telling that Obama is thin skinned about being outed at being Marxist. He knows even the enraptured Peggy Noonan voters will not even put up with Obamamerika.
Mark as offensive

hrb266

Just so you know, Bush did do it with a DEMORAT congress.
Mark as offensive

DMCQ60

Me thinks that he [the socialist] doth protest too much ! Come on Barry you can come out of the closet, we won't laugh.
Mark as offensive

hrb266

"efforts his administration has made to stabilize the economy" Sounds like socialism to me.
Mark as offensive

whereisjohngaltweneedhimnow

Obama and his minions are dangerous and want the United States to become a third rate Socialist country. He is out to destroy our country. The policies he espouses through more government and higher taxes on the people who creat the wealth and of course the jobs in this country will kill jobs not creat them. I have never been hired by a poor man!!! Trying to make everyone poor is not leadership it,s insanity
Mark as offensive

ensignbay

The "It's Bush's fault" argument is old. And it's a smokescreen. Because Bush wasn't a Conservative doesn't mean Obama isn't a socialist or Marxist. When will Republicans loudly call him on his socialist policies?? When will they unitedly FIGHT for our founding principles??? Join me in demanding RINOs either RETURN to REAGAN CONSERVATISM in the face of Obama's socialism, or GET OUT: === http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/we-demand-true-conservative-leadership.html ======
Mark as offensive

Jack123

This is just another example that confirms that Barak Obama is in way over his head. Simply incompetent and he knows it. That is why he is so insecure. We keep hearing out of the Whitehouse about his arrogance - what appears as arrogance is simply acute insecurity. Barak Obama's rhetoric is destroying the morale of this country. Barak Obama's policies are destroying the fabric of this country. Barak Obama has initiated an all-out assault on property rights and individual responsibility. Barak Obama has enacted a massive wealth transfer from the Heartland out to the coasts of the country. When are citizens going to wake up?
Mark as offensive
‹‹ previous1234 ... 14151617next ››

Please login or register to post a comment

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.