The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out


  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
    • World
    • National
    • Politics
    • National Security
    • DC Area
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Technology
    • Investigations
    • Faith
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Headlines
    • Citizen Journalism
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • TWT BLOGS: Latest
  • Staff blogs
  • Create a blog

Scientists: Manmade global warming is a sham

By Carleton Bryant on Dec. 10, 2008 into Out of Context

  • Subscribe

More than 650 scientists from around the world dispute the claims made by the United Nations and former Vice President Al Gore about global warming, saying that science does not support that climate change is a manmade phenomenon, according to a posting on the Senate environmental committee's press blog.

According to the posting, a full Senate report on the dissenting scientists' views is to be released within 24 hours.

Is it hot in here, Al, or is it just you?

I've found that you've really got to pay close attention to how people talk about global warming or climate change. Most scientists agree that climate change indeed is occurring — they just differ on the reason why it is occurring.

As for myself, I'm no scientist (or a Nobel Prize-winning former vice president), but I think that if you're trying to find out why things are heating up, the sun would be a good place to start, especially since there's plenty of scientific data showing that the earth has been running hot and cold for thousands of years.

(One time I walked into my kitchen and it felt unusually warm. At first I thought it might be due to a build up of greenhouse gases from the trash can. Then I thought, "Is the oven on?" It was.)

But that's just me. I also think that the Chicago Cubs have a shot at the World Series every year, that bell bottoms are always in fashion and that I can singlehandedly bring back everyday usage of the word groovy.

So all we can do now is wait for the Senate report.

Groovy.

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Comment

There are 1 Comments

rhjames

This is just one group who dispute the claims of Al Gore, and further, the IPCC. There are many more. They are asking the same question as myself - where is the evidence that increased CO2 concentration causes significant temperature increase? Computer models that have failed to predict the past 10 years of cooling aren't valid. We want real data. The IPCC Chairman, Dr. Pachauri recently said that "global warming is happening faster than expected", yet temperature has dropped over the past 10 years. It makes you wonder, doesn't it? I hope someone in authority listens to these scientists, many of whom are ex IPCC participants.
Mark as offensive

Please login or register to post a comment

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.